The transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty is now widely used in catheterization laboratories worldwide, which had been shown as advantages over the conventional femoral and brachial approaches due to the lower incidence of bleeding and other cardiovascular complications. However, the transradial approach does not seem suitable for 5-15% of patients undergoing coronary angiography and angioplasty. The ulnar artery which is one of the two terminal branches of the brachial artery is usually larger than radial artery and it may be as a potential approach for cardiac catheterization. Recently, some reports have demonstrated that the transulnar approach may be both feasible and safe for coronary angiography and angioplasty in selective patients.we performed this study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transulnar approach coronary catheterization in real world non-selective patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
1,000
The second hospital of Hebei medical university
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
RECRUITINGCoronary artery cannulation
vascular events including arterial occlusion through ulnar/radial artery approach
Time frame: 1-12 month
Interventional procedure characteristic
The secondary end points included the crossover rate, spasm, total time for the procedure
Time frame: during procedure
The access-site related complications
The access-site related complications were defined as the occurrence of hematoma, artery stenosis, arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, and nerve injury
Time frame: 1-12 month follow up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.