This local, prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study documents observational data on patients under routine treatment of metastatic RCC with Nexavar before and after cytoreductive nephrectomy. It's planned to better understand the impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy on Nexavar efficacy and possibly to define patients who get the most benefit from Nexavar before cytoreductive nephrectomy.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
61
The patients under routine treatment of metastatic RCC with Nexavar before and after cytoreductive nephrectomy meeting the criteria of inclusion.
Unnamed facility
Multiple Locations, Russia
Maximum percent reduction (based on the minimum post baseline value) in the longest diameter of the primary tumor in response to neoadjuvant Nexavar treatment.
Time frame: up to 2 years
Response rate of residual disease to Nexavar according to RECIST 1.1 with baseline after cytoreductive nephrectomy.
Time frame: up to 2 years
Response before cytoreductive nephrectomy according to RECIST 1.1.
Time frame: up to 2 years
Maximum percent reduction in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions according to RECIST 1.1 while on Nexavar treatment before cytoreductive nephrectomy
Time frame: up to 2 years
Maximum percent reduction in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions of residual disease after cytoreductive nephrectomy according to RECIST 1.1 while on Nexavar treatment with baseline after cytoreductive nephrectomy.
Time frame: up to 2 years
Number of participants with AEs, including intra- and postoperative complications, relation to Nexavar treatment, AEs treatment, AEs outcome.
Time frame: up to 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.