This multicenter, randomized, open-label study will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of atezolizumab as monotherapy or in combination with bevacizumab versus sunitinib in participants with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have not received prior systemic therapy either in the adjuvant or metastatic setting.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
305
Atezolizumab will be administered according to the dosage schedule mentioned in the arm description.
Bevacizumab will be administered according to the dosage schedule mentioned in the arm description.
Sunitinib will be administered according to the dosage schedule mentioned in the arm description.
HonorHealth Research Institute - Bisgrove
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
Duarte, California, United States
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of California
San Francisco, California, United States
Univ Colorado Health Sci Ctr
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) Via Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment or Death in Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population
Progressive Disease (PD): at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm); appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment in ITT Population
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment or Death in Immune Cell 1/2/3 (IC1/2/3) Population
PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
PFS Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment in IC1/2/3 Population
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment or Death in Participants Who Have Tumors With Higher Than Median Expression of an Immune Gene Signature
PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
PFS Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment in Participants Who Have Tumors With Higher Than Median Expression of an Immune Gene Signature
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment or Death in Participants Who Have Tumors With Higher Than Median Expression of an Immune Gene Signature
PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
PFS Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment in Participants Who Have Tumors With Higher Than Median Expression of an Immune Gene Signature
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Rocky Mountain Cancer Ctr - Denver (Williams)
Denver, Colorado, United States
Yale Uni School of Medicine; Section of Medical Oncology
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Georgetown U; Lombardi Comp Can
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
SCRI Florida Cancer Specialists South
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Mayo Clinic-Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
...and 35 more locations
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment or Death in Participants Who Have Tumors With Higher Than the 33rd Percentile Expression of an Immune Gene Signature
PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
PFS Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment in Participants Who Have Tumors With Higher Than the 33rd Percentile Expression of an Immune Gene Signature
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment or Death in Participants Who Have Tumors With Higher Than the 33rd Percentile Expression of an Immune Gene Signature
PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
PFS Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment in Participants Who Have Tumors With Higher Than the 33rd Percentile Expression of an Immune Gene Signature
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment or Death in ITT Population
PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
PFS Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment in ITT Population
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment or Death in IC1/2/3 Population
PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
PFS Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment in IC1/2/3 Population
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment in ITT Population
Objective Response was defined as CR or PR. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker level; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to less than (\<) 10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or (if applicable) maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment in IC1/2/3 Population
Objective Response was defined as CR or PR. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker level; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or (if applicable) maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment in ITT Population
Objective Response was defined as CR or PR. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker level; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or (if applicable) maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment in IC1/2/3 Population
Objective Response was defined as CR or PR. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker level; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or (if applicable) maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Per Modified RECIST Via Investigator Assessment in ITT Population
Objective Response was defined as CR or PR. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target and all new measurable lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters, in absence of CR.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Per Modified RECIST Via Investigator Assessment in IC1/2/3 Population
Objective Response was defined as CR or PR. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target and all new measurable lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters, in absence of CR.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per Modified RECIST Via Investigator Assessment or Death in ITT Population
PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of all target and new measurable lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
PFS Per Modified RECIST Via Investigator Assessment in ITT Population
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of all target and new measurable lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per Modified RECIST Via Investigator Assessment or Death in IC1/2/3 Population
PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of all target and new measurable lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
PFS Per Modified RECIST Via Investigator Assessment in IC1/2/3 Population
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of all target and new measurable lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment in ITT Population
DOR was defined as the time from first observation of an objective response (CR or PR) until first observation of PD. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker level; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or (if applicable) maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate DOR.
Time frame: From CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
DOR Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment in ITT Population
DOR was defined as the time from first observation of an objective response (CR or PR) until first observation of PD. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker level; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or (if applicable) maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate DOR.
Time frame: From CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
DOR Per RECIST v1.1 Via IRC Assessment in IC1/2/3 Population
DOR was defined as the time from first observation of an objective response (CR or PR) until first observation of PD. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker level; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or (if applicable) maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate DOR.
Time frame: From CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
DOR Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment in IC1/2/3 Population
DOR was defined as the time from first observation of an objective response (CR or PR) until first observation of PD. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker level; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or (if applicable) maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate DOR.
Time frame: From CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
DOR Per Modified RECIST Via Investigator Assessment in ITT Population
DOR was defined as the time from first observation of an objective response (CR or PR) until first observation of PD. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target and all new measurable lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters, in absence of CR. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of all target and new measurable lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate DOR.
Time frame: From CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
DOR Per Modified RECIST Via Investigator Assessment in IC1/2/3 Population
DOR was defined as the time from first observation of an objective response (CR or PR) until first observation of PD. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target and all new measurable lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters, in absence of CR. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of all target and new measurable lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate DOR.
Time frame: From CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants Who Died in ITT Population
Time frame: Randomization until death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Overall Survival (OS) in ITT Population
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate OS.
Time frame: Randomization until death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants Who Died in IC1/2/3 Population
Time frame: Randomization until death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
OS in IC1/2/3 Population
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate OS.
Time frame: Randomization until death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment in Crossover Population
Objective Response was defined as CR or PR. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker level; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or (if applicable) maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Time frame: From start of crossover treatment until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
DOR Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment in Crossover Population
DOR was defined as the time from first observation of an objective response (CR or PR) until first observation of PD. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker level; or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or (if applicable) maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate DOR.
Time frame: From start of crossover treatment until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Per RECIST v1.1 Via Investigator Assessment or Death in Crossover Population
PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: From start of crossover treatment until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
PFS Per RECIST v.1.1 Via Investigator Assessment in Crossover Population
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; appearance of one or more new target or non-target lesions; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: From start of crossover treatment until disease progression or death due to any cause (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years)
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to Atezolizumab
This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in 'Atezolizumab' and 'Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab' arms only.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 until treatment discontinuation (until data cut-off date 17 October 2016, up to approximately 2.75 years) (1 cycle=6 weeks)
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab
Time frame: 30 minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (1 cycle=6 weeks) (infusion length for first dose=60 minutes)
Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab
Time frame: Pre-infusion (0 hour) on Day 1 of Cycles 2 and 4; Day 22 of Cycles 1, 2, and 4 (1 cycle=6 weeks) (infusion length=30-60 minutes)
Cmax of Bevacizumab
Time frame: 30 minutes after end of infusion on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (1 cycle=6 weeks) (infusion length=30-90 minutes)
Cmin of Bevacizumab
Time frame: For Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Arm: at First-line treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 2.75 years); For Crossover Arms: pre-infusion (0 hour) on Day 1 of Cycle 2 (1 cycle=6 weeks) (infusion length=30-90 minutes)
M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) Interference Score
MDASI questionnaire comprises of 2 parts: symptoms (16 items), interference with daily life (6 items). Participants were asked to rate how much their symptoms interfered with general activity, mood, work, relations with other people, walking, and enjoyment of life during the last 24 hours. Each item in the interference score was answered on a scale of 0 (did not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely). The mean score of all 6 items was reported on the scale of 0 (did not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely).
Time frame: Days 1 and 22 of Cycles 1 to 24; Day 1 of Cycle 25; treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 2.75 years) (1 cycle=6 weeks)
Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Fatigue Level Score
BFI questionnaire comprises of 2 parts: fatigue level (3 items), interference with daily life (1 item with 6 sub-items). Each items in the fatigue level score was answered on a scale of 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). The mean score of all 3 items was reported on the scale of 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine).
Time frame: Days 1 and 22 of Cycles 1 to 24; Day 1 of Cycle 25; treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 2.75 years) (1 cycle=6 weeks)