This study looks to examine whether or not INTUNIV extended release can help children aged 6-12 years diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in improving Executive Function when added to their usual care stimulant therapy. Executive functions are a set of mental processes that include emotional control, planning, organization, working memory, inhibition of behaviors, and managing time and space. As children with ADHD usually have difficulties with Executive Function, and Executive function difficulties lead to more difficulties in school and behaviour, it is anticipated that adding INTUNIV extended release to usual stimulant therapy will improve Executive Function scores as rated by parents and teachers. Improvements in quality of life will also be measured.
Although stimulant medications have been shown to have positive impact on executive function (EF) (Findling et al, 2009; Hale et al. 2011), little has been documented about the effect of INTUNIV extended release on EF in children. The manifestation of clinical symptoms related to impairment in EF often leads to the search for additional treatment options and in many cases to adjunct therapies to the traditional stimulant medication treatment regimen. Demonstrating that the addition of INTUNIV extended release to usual stimulant therapy is effective for symptom control as well as in improving EF may influence clinical treatment algorithms and the need for health care resources to effectively manage patients. Since EF deficits negatively impact academic achievement and behavior at school and because children spend a large number of daytime hours at school, the concordance of any reported improvement in the school and the home environment will be examined. Overall improvement in quality of life with the addition of INTUNIV extended release will also be evaluated.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
50
patient will continue to take stable dosage of usual stimulant therapy (Ritalin, Ritalin SR, Biphentin, Concerta, Vyvanse, Adderall or Dexedrine)
JPM van Stralen Medicine Professional Corporation
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Effect of Adjunctive INTUNIV Extended Release Treatment on Executive Function as Assessed by Change From Baseline on the BRIEF-parent Questionnaires
The Behavioural Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) was developed to assess such real-world expressions of executive function in the home (BRIEF-P) as assessed by the parent. This is an 86 item questionnaire completed by the parents. The score is converted to a t-score with a score less than 65 being considered within the normal range. Higher scores are worsening in function.
Time frame: measured at baseline and end of each 12 week treament arm
Effect of Adjunctive INTUNIV Extended Release Treatment on Change in Quality of Life as Assessed by the KINDL®-Child Questionnaire.
The KINDL is a quality of life questionnaire of 24 items completed by the subject (KINDL-child). It is a generic instrument for assessing Health Related quality of life in children and adolescents aged 3 years and older. Norm values are given based on representative German data from the German National Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS) study, a broad survey realized by the German Robert-Koch Institute. The KINDL scores were converted to range between 0 and 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life as reported by the child
Time frame: Measured at baseline and end of each 12 week treatment arm
Effect of Adjunct Therapy on ADHD Symptom Control as Assessed by the Change in the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS-IV)
The ADHD-RS-IV is completed by the Investigator familiar with the scale. It is an 18 item scale designed to reflect current symptomatology of ADHD based on the DSM-5 criteria. Each item is scored from a range of 0 (reflecting no symptoms) to 3 (reflecting severe symptoms) with total scores ranging from 0-54, with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms
Time frame: comparison from baseline to end of each 12 week treatment arm
Subjects Experiencing Suicidal Ideation, Suicidal Behaviour and Self-injurious Behaviour Without Suicidal Intent and Incident of Serious Adverse Events in Each Treatment Arm
To compare the number of subjects experiencing suicidal ideation, suicidal behaviour and self-injurious behaviour without suicidal intent as assessed by the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and incident of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in each treatment arm
Time frame: Measured up to 30 weeks
Evaluate the Effect of Adjunctive INTUNIV Extended Release Treatment on Change in Quality of Life as Assessed by the KINDL®-Parent Questionnaire.
The KINDL is a quality of life questionnaire of 24 items completed by the parent (KINDL-parent). It is a generic instrument for assessing Health Related quality of life in children and adolescents aged 3 years and older. Norm values are given based on representative German data from the German National Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS) study, a broad survey realized by the German Robert-Koch Institute. The KINDL scores were converted to range between 0 and 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life as reported by the parent.
Time frame: Measured at baseline and end of each 12 week treatment arm
Effect of Adjunct Therapy on ADHD Symptom Control as Assessed by the Change on the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Scale
The Clinical Global Impression- Severity scale is a scale of illness ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (among the most severely ill patients). Subjects who felt normal, not at all ill or borderline mentally ill are considered improved. The outcome measure is reporting the percentage of participants showing improvement
Time frame: comparison from baseline to end of each 12 week treatment arm
Evaluate the Effect of Adjunct Therapy on ADHD Symptom Control as Assessed by the Change in Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale
CGI-I is a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Subjects who felt very much improved or much improved are considered improved.The outcome measure is reporting the percentage of participants showing improvement
Time frame: comparison from baseline to end of each 12 week treatment arm
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.