The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy, acceptability and unintended consequences of very low nicotine content cigarettes (VLNCC) in smokers with current or past year substance use disorders (SUD). The primary aim of this study is to determine whether 6 weeks of VLNCC compared to normal nicotine content cigarettes (NNCC) will result in more smoking cessation over 6 months and reduce cigarette use, cotinine, and biomarkers of toxicity. We will also assess the effects of VLNCC versus NNCC cigarettes on frequency of substance use and substance cravings (drugs and alcohol) because this is relevant to the safety of these products among smokers with SUD. Secondary aims are to study effects on cigarette craving, nicotine withdrawal and dependence, and depressed mood. Methods: Random assignment to VLNCC versus NNCC of up to 312 smokers with SUD will be balanced by gender, degree of tobacco dependence, and recent drug and alcohol use. All smokers will be provided with smoking counseling. Assessments over 6 months will assess effects both during the 6 weeks of using research cigarettes and after return to usual cigarettes. The importance is in determining the viability and safety of this public health strategy in terms of effects on both smoking and other substance use in a highly addicted population, which is essential to determine before the FDA implements this policy.
The 2009 passage of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA) gave the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to reduce levels of nicotine in cigarettes if appropriate for public health. This project addresses an area targeted for study by NIH and the FDA to assess the impact of products with reduced toxicity on tobacco use behaviors. Very-low nicotine content cigarettes (VLNCC) have been shown in some studies with smokers from the general population to reduce craving and withdrawal for tobacco relative to abstinence with little or no compensatory smoking, suggesting that a mandated reduction in the nicotine yield of cigarettes could substantially reduce smoking rates. This may be a particularly effective method of reducing smoking and smoking-related disease in special populations that have very high rates of tobacco dependence, such as people with substance use disorders (SUD). However, the consequences of this policy for smokers with SUD have not been investigated, and a call has gone out for studies of the safety of these products with vulnerable populations such as these. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy, acceptability and unintended consequences of VLNCC in smokers with SUD (current or past year) currently abstinent from hard drugs. The primary aims are to determine whether VLNCC will increase smoking cessation and reduce cigarette use, cotinine, and biomarkers of toxicity in smokers with SUD relative to baseline and to those randomized to a normal nicotine content cigarette (NNCC), and to determine any unintended effects of VLNCC on substance use and cravings to use substances so as to investigate safety. Secondary aims are to study effects on cigarette craving and nicotine withdrawal and dependence (mechanisms), and state depression (safety). A 2-group between-group by pre-post design will compare 6 weeks of VLNCC to NNCC; all smokers will also be provided with smoking counseling. Follow-up over 6 months will assess effects after return to usual cigarettes. The importance is in determining the viability and safety of this public health strategy in terms of effects on both smoking and other substance use in a highly addicted population, which is essential to determine before the FDA implements this policy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
250
Brief session of Brief advice. Assess smoking and provide assistance with quitting via coping skills.
Brown University's Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence
self-report of past 7 days abstinence confirmed by expired carbon monoxide (CO) reading of 6 ppm or less
Time frame: 6 weeks
Total N'-nitrosonornicotine (NNAL)
Urinary N'-nitrosonornicotine and its glucuronide provide a measure of metabolites of the tobacco-specific carcinogen N'-nitrosonornicotine
Time frame: 6 weeks
Number of cigarettes smoked per day
Time Line Follow Back for tobacco use will assess self-reported number of cigarettes smoked each day
Time frame: 6 weeks
Number of substance use days
Time Line Follow Back will assess self-reported number of days of drinking or drug use. Any days of either will be counted as a substance use day.
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Beck Depression Inventory
Beck Depression Inventory will be administered at baseline and 6 weeks to detect any change in depression scores from baseline
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Total N'-nitrosonornicotine (NNN)
Urinary N'-nitrosonornicotine and its glucuronide provide a measure of metabolites of the tobacco-specific carcinogen N'-nitrosonornicotine
Time frame: 6 weeks
3-hydroxypyrene (3-HOP)
Urinary 3-hydroxypyrene and its glucuronide and sulfate provides a measure of a metabolite of pyrene, a biomarker for uptake of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Time frame: 6 weeks
3-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid (3-HPMA)
Urinary 3-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid (3-HPMA) provides a measure of a metabolite of the toxicant acrolein
Time frame: 6 weeks
Total urinary cotinine levels
cotinine plus cotinine-glucuronide, assessed via urinalysis
Time frame: 6 weeks
duration of longest tobacco abstinence period
Time Line Follow Back (TLFB) for tobacco use will be used to record self-reported tobacco abstinence each day. The longest number of contiguous abstinence days will be recorded.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Questionnaire of Smoking Urges, Brief Form
Questionnaire of Smoking Urges, Brief Form assesses strong desire/intention to smoke and anticipating negative-affect relief from smoking. The total score from the 10 items will be used.
Time frame: 6 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.