A comparison of the efficacy of APD421 and placebo in the prevention of PONV in patients at moderate-to-high risk of PONV.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
368
CHU de Hautepierre
Strasbourg, France
University Hospitals of Würzburg
Würzburg, Germany
Complete Response (no Emesis, Significant Nausea or Rescue Medication)
The primary efficacy analysis was a comparison of the incidence of Complete Response (absence of PONV1) in the 0-24-hour period after surgery, between the active treatment group and the placebo group using Pearson square test with Yates's continuity correction at a two-sided significance level of 5%.
Time frame: 24 hours after end of surgery
Complete Response (no Emesis or Rescue Medication)
Time frame: 24 hrs after end of surgery
Total Response (no Emesis, Nausea or Rescue Medication)
Time frame: 24 hrs after end of surgery
Incidence of Emesis (Vomiting/Retching)
An assessment of a participant experiencing an episode of emesis (vomiting/ retching) or received anti-emetic rescue medication during the 24hours after the completion of the surgery
Time frame: 24 hours after end of surgeryry
Incidence of Nausea
Count of patients experiencing an episode of nausea scored ≥ 1 of 0-10 verbal response scale during the 24 hours period after the completion of surgery
Time frame: 24 hours after end of surgery
Incidence of Significant Nausea
Count of participants with nausea score ≥ 4 on 0-10 verbal response scale
Time frame: 24 hours after end of surgery
Use of Rescue Medication
Time frame: 24 hours after end of surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.