The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a psychosocial and nutritional intervention, entitled "RelAte", on cooking and mealtime behaviours of older adults who are living alone and at risk of social isolation. The intervention will be delivered in the home of participants by a trained volunteer of a similar age.
The trial employs a randomised controlled trial design to evaluate the impact of a novel mealtime intervention for older adults who are living alone and may be at risk of social isolation. The intervention combines social interaction, cooking, and shared mealtime behaviour, as well as nutritional education, in a once-weekly, mealtime visit, delivered by a peer volunteer. RelAte is grounded in psychological theory. It is expected that the RelAte intervention will have a beneficial impact on self-efficacy and on energy intake among participants. As an additional point, we will be looking at whether the intervention also impacts on physical and mental health among older adults over time. RelAte involves sharing a mealtime with a trained peer volunteer once a week for 8 weeks, as well as sharing the cooking and food preparation associated with the meal. The one-to-one intervention comprises social, nutritional and cooking components, and can be described as a complex intervention. The intervention will run for 8 weeks and each participant will be matched with a peer volunteer for the duration. At baseline and at three follow-up points, participants will undergo a social cognitive, and nutritional assessment, as well as physical and mental health assessments, to ascertain whether the intervention has a lasting impact on defined primary outcomes. Participant outcomes will also be compared with the control group to assess the impact of the intervention. Volunteers will also undergo an assessment to investigate whether being a volunteer in an intervention has positive impact on psychological wellbeing and social connectedness. Primarily the intention is to improve self-efficacy and energy intake among older adults, thus maintaining or improving general functioning, rather than treating an existing condition or syndrome. Thus the intervention aims to optimise functioning in older adults rather than to treat a pre-existing condition.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
100
The mealtime intervention constitutes once a week visits from a trained volunteer for 8 weeks, each visit lasting 90 minutes and comprising of preparing and sharing a meal together with the participant.
Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin
Dublin, Ireland
Change in Self-efficacy over 6 months
Self-efficacy measured using the Generalised Self-efficacy scale (Schwarzer \& Jerusalem,1995) and the nutrition self-efficacy scale (Schwarzer \& Renner, 2000) will be assessed for all participants.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, in the week post-intervention, at 12-week and at 26-week follow-up
Change in Food-related health beliefs over 6 months
This outcome measure is a social cognitive variable measured using the Health Beliefs Survey (Anderson, Winett \& Wojcik, 2007). The survey assess beliefs related to the impact of food on health, including food-related goals, outcome expectations, beliefs and strategies relating to food.
Time frame: At baseline, in the week post-intervention, at 12-week and 26-week follow-up
Change in Energy intake over 6 months
Energy intake will be measured using two 24-hour dietary recall metrics, whereby the participant is asked to recall on two occasions within the same week everything they have eaten or drank in the past 24 hours. The assessors will receive dietetic training in how to measure energy intake, e.g. the types of probes and questions that can help to achieve an accurate recall of dietary intake.
Time frame: Baseline, in the week post-intervention, at 12-week and 26-week follow-up
Change in Quality of Life over 6 months
Participant quality of life, measured using the CASP-19 (Control, Autonomy, Self-Realisation, Pleasure) Measure (Hyde, Wiggins, Higgs \& Blane, 2003) will be used as a secondary measure to evaluate whether RelAte intervention improves quality of life over time.
Time frame: Baseline, in the week post-intervention, at 12-week and 26-week follow-up
Change in Cognitive function over 6 months
Cognitive function in the participants will be assessed over time using 2 measures: the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Nasreddine et al., 2005) and the Trail Making Test (Lezak, 2004).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline, in the week post-intervention, and at 12-week and 26-week follow-up
Premorbid cognitive function
Premorbid cognitive function will be assessed using the National Adult Reading test (Bright, Jaldow \& Kopelman, 2002).
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Change in Social Connectedness over 6 months
Social connectedness will be measured using the Berkman Social Network Index (Berkman \& Syme, 1979).
Time frame: Baseline assessment, in the week post-intervention, and at 12-week and 26-week follow-up
Change in Psychological Wellbeing over 6 months
Psychological wellbeing in participants will be assessed using the Centre for Epidemiological Studies depression scale (CES-D; Radloff,1977), the Hospital Anxiety \& Depression - Anxiety Subscale (HADS-A; Zigmond \& Snaith, 1983) and the Ryff scale of psychological wellbeing (Ryff \& Keyes,1995).
Time frame: Baseline assessment, in the week post-intervention, at 12-week and 26-week follow-up
Change in Nutritional Health over 6 months
Nutritional health and risk of malnutrition will be assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment (Vellas et al.,1999) the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (Stratton, 2004). as well as the Food Enjoyment Scale (Vailas \& Nitzke, 1998).
Time frame: Baseline assessment, in the week post-intervention, 12-week and 26-week follow-up
Change in Body Mass Index over 6 months
Body mass index for each participant will be measured using a clinical stadiometer and body composition weighing scales. Abdominal circumference will also be measured to further assess body composition.
Time frame: Baseline assessment, in the week post-intervention and at 12-week and 26-week follow-up
Change in Frailty over 6 months
Frailty will be measured using the SHARE-Frailty Instrument (Romero-Ortuno, Walsh, Lawlor \& Kenny, 2010) which includes measurement of grip strength using a clinical dynamometer.
Time frame: Baseline assessment, in the week post-intervention, and at 12-week and 26-week follow-up
Change in Overall Health over 6 months
Overall health will be assessed using the Health Utilities Index (Horsman, Furlong, Feeny \& Torrance, 2003).
Time frame: Baseline assessment, in the week post-intervention, 12-week and 26-week follow-up
Change in Peer volunteer wellbeing pre and post intervention
We will also assess the wellbeing of the peer volunteers trained to deliver the intervention, measured using the Ryff scale (Ryff \& Keyes,1995). T the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (Weiss, Dawis \& England, 1967), the de Jong loneliness scale (De Jong Gierveld \& Van Tilburg, 2006) and the Social Network Index (Berkman \& Syme,1979).
Time frame: Baseline and in the week post-intervention