The mainstay of chondrosarcoma treatment is a wide surgical resection. Unfortunately, this is a rare occurrence, and patients with incomplete resection have very poor therapeutic options. In this context, it becomes important to find new therapeutic strategies to slow down tumor progression and to reduce tumor size before resection. Pre-clinical and clinical data suggest that EVEROLIMUS should be efficient as adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapy in chondrosarcoma. Then, investigators propose a phase II, randomized, open label study compounded by 3 arms (1:1:1) to assess efficiency of EVEROLIMUS as neo-adjuvant therapy in patients with primary or relapsed chondrosarcomas : ARM 1 = No treatment; ARM 2 = 2,5 mg Everolimus/day; ARM 3 = 10 mg Everolimus/day. The treatments will be taken for 4 weeks before surgery, apart from any premature withdrawn
Chondrosarcomas (CHS) represent 25% of bone sarcomas and are the second most frequent primary malignant type of bone tumor. No effective systemic treatment has been identified in advanced or adjuvant phases for CHS. As CHS are relatively resistant to chemo- and radiotherapy, surgery remains the primary treatment of this tumor type. The aim of tumor resection is to obtain complete removal of the malignant lesion with adequate margins taking into account tumor control and functional reconstruction. However, considering the particular localizations of CHS, a wide resection (i.e. R0 clear margins) is rarely achieved. Unfortunately, therapeutic options are limited for patients with incomplete resection. In this context, new therapeutic strategies are needed to slow down tumor progression and to reduce tumor size before surgery. Increasing knowledge of the signal transduction pathways involved in oncogenesis has led to speculation that components of signalling pathways could be envisaged as novel targets for cancer therapy. Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR), which lies downstream of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/B kinase protein (PI3K/Akt) pathway, plays a central role in the regulation of cancer cell growth, suggesting that mTOR could be an attractive target for anti-cancer therapy. The PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway is intimately implicated in sarcoma development and progression. Indeed, mutations and/ or overexpression of one or several components of the PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway are often observed in sarcoma. These alterations, located both upstream and downstream of mTOR, lead to dysregulation of the mTOR pathway. mTOR inhibitor evaluation as anticancer agents has began with rapamycin analogues (called rapalogs). Currently, mTOR inhibitors under clinical development include temsirolimus (CCI-779, Torisel®, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals), everolimus (RAD001, Afinitor®, Novartis Pharmaceuticals), and ridaforolimus (AP23573, ARIAD Pharmaceuticals). mTOR inhibitors were found to be efficient in various preclinical cancer models, for example in a preclinical mouse model of follicular thyroid cancer, everolimus induced a significant decrease in proliferation of cancer cells. Two sets of recent data suggest that inhibition of mTOR pathway could be an effective systemic treatment for chondrosarcoma. The first one is a case report describing an impressive tumor response in a patient with myxoid chondrosarcoma treated by rapamycin in combination with cyclophosphamide. The second one concerns nonclinical data generated by our institution. Using an orthotopic rat chondrosarcoma model, we have shown that monotherapy with everolimus inhibits chondrosarcoma proliferation as evaluated by Ki67 expression and significantly reduced tumor volume. Importantly, when given in a "pseudo-adjuvant" setting following R1 resection of the implanted tumor, everolimus significantly delayed tumor recurrence. These preclinical data provide a strong rationale to evaluate the therapeutic potential of everolimus in both the neo-adjuvant and adjuvant settings in patients with chondrosarcoma. In this context, the proposal of the investigators is to perform a multicenter, randomized, Phase II study in patients with a primary or relapsed chondrosarcoma in neo-adjuvant setting
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
57
Comparison between 2,5 mg/day of Everolimus per os to 10 mg/day, or to no treatment, taken during 30 days before chondrosarcoma surgery
Comparison between 10 mg/day of Everolimus per os to 2.5 mg/day, or to no treatment taken during 30 days before chondrosarcoma surgery
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux, Gironde, France
Institut Claudius Regaud
Toulouse, Haute Garonne, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Hôpital Dupuytren
Limoges, Haute Vienne, France
Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier
Montpellier, Hérault, France
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Hôpital Trousseau
Tours, Indre et Loire, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Hôtel Dieu
Nantes, Loire Atlantique, France
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - René Gauducheau
Saint-Herblain, Loire Atlantique, France
Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Meurthe et Moselle, France
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, Nord, France
CHRU de Lille - Hôpital Roger Salengro
Lille, Nord, France
...and 2 more locations
Success Rate obtained per arm
A success is defined as a variation (decrease) of Ki67 expression \> 10% during treatment
Time frame: 4 weeks after inclusion
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS = Time from randomization until the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. Patients without any progression at the end of the 3 years follow up will be censured at this date.
Time frame: At time of progression in the course of the 3 years follow up after randomization
Safety
Based on the frequency of Adverse Events according to common toxicity criteria (CTC V4.0), taking to account post operative complications and functional outcomes
Time frame: In the course of the 3 years after randomization
Overall Survival
Patients who are alive at the end of the 3 years follow up will be censured at this date.
Time frame: At time of death if occuring during the 3 years of follow up after randomization
Quality of Life
Data collected from a questionnaire at inclusion, surgery, 3th month, 6th month, 12th month, 24th month and 36th month after surgery
Time frame: From randomization to the end of the 3 years follow up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.