This is a single-arm observational longitudinal study in of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer designed to assess the longitudinal trajectory of pain and other symptoms.
This is a single-arm observational longitudinal study in of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer designed to assess the longitudinal trajectory of pain and other symptoms. The study aims to address several key methodological questions that will inform the design of future clinical trials with symptom endpoints in this population, including: the definition of "clinically meaningful" pain; criteria for concluding a clinically meaningful pain reduction; criteria for concluding clinically meaningful pain progression; reliable methods quantifying analgesic use (given that "equianalgesic tables" and "point scoring systems" are generally considered unreliable by pain researchers and regulatory agencies , , ); ideal recall periods for pain questions; tradeoffs of different frequencies of symptom reporting; symptom trajectories over time; and associations of pain scores with other metrics used in prostate cancer research (imaging, PSA values, circulating tumor cells, etc).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
213
Patients will report pain and analgesic use through the automated telephone system, for 7 days in a row, once every 6 weeks. Data from diagnostic tests (CT Abdomen/Pelvis, Bone Scan, PSA, and circulating tumor cells) conducted during the study period will be collected from medical records by local personnel and entered into the secure online database quarterly, but no specific tests or schedules will be required in this observational study. Patients will remain on study for up to 26 months (slightly longer than the expected median survival in this population based on data from docetaxel, abiraterone, and MDV3100 pivotal phase 3 trials).
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Proportion of pain palliation responders
Determine the proportion of pain palliation responders and the proportion experiencing pain progression will be presented along with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Clinical significance of pain score changes
Determine the clinical significance of pain score changes. Pain score changes will be compared with each of the following "anchors": patient rating of change in pain, as well as changes in patient functional status, analgesic use, and various measures of disease status (imaging, PSA, circulating tumor cells). ROC curves derived using logistic regression analyses will be used to characterize the association between change in pain scores and clinically important improvement (defined by anchor variables).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Prevalence and trajectory of pain progression and pain palliation
Descriptive statistics, including Kaplan-Meier, will be used to report findings for the proportion of asymptomatic men who ultimately develop pain, the median time until asymptomatic men develop pain, the median time until men with pain experience pain progression, and the median time until men with pain experience pain palliation.
Time frame: 3 weeks
Quantifying analgesic medication use
Three different approaches to calculating a single value to represent total analgesic use will be compared: 1) equianalgesic tables published in guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) which convert various drugs and doses to "morphine equivalents"; 2) point scoring systems used in prior pivotal phase 3 trials based on the World Health Organization analgesic ladder in which lower points are assigned to weaker agents/doses and vice versa for stronger agents/doses; and 3) individual drug dose quantification, a dose recently suggested by the FDA but never empirically evaluated, in which each analgesic is considered individually and a 25% change in dose is considered an increase or decrease for each.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 26 months
Frequency of pain reporting
Seven consecutive days of reporting a pain item with a 24-hour recall item will be compared with a single administration of a pain item with a 7-day recall, in order to evaluate if the latter alone is sufficient for measuring pain.
Time frame: 7 days
Web-avidity of patients
Identify the web-avidity of patients by summarizing patients' responses to questionnaire items about their use of internet and email.
Time frame: 6 weeks