In case of severe ankle arthritis, the two common surgical treatments are tibiotalar arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. Few studies have compared these treatments and it remains difficult to determine which operation is the better solution for end stage ankle arthritis. The purpose of the present study is to analyze patient's outcome after each type of ankle surgery and to describe the decision making process.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Leuven, Belgium
AZ Turnout - Clinic Sint-Jozef
Turnhout, Belgium
Clinique Axium
Aix-en-Provence, France
I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi
Milan, Italy
proportion of reoperations in the total ankle replacement arm and in the tibiotalar arthrodesis arm
Reoperation will be defined as any secondary surgery related to the operated ankle or adjacent joints (subtalar, talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints), excluding wound healing problems.
Time frame: after 5 years of follow-up
Proportion of reoperation in the tibiotalar arthrodesis arm and in the total ankle replacement arm
The proportion of reoperation as defined above and for the whole study period in the tibiotalar arthrodesis arm and in the total ankle replacement arm
Time frame: 1, 2, 7 and 10 years
proportion of revision for the whole study period in the tibiotalar arthrodesis arm and in the total ankle replacement arm
For the arthrodesis arm, a revision will be defined as a reoperation for one of the following reasons: nonunion or pseudoarthrosis or malunion. Hardware removal will not be considered as a revision. For the total ankle arthroplasty arm, a revision will be defined as the change of any metallic component of the implanted device. The incidental change of the polyethylene will not be considered as a revision except when it is broken without any
Time frame: 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
The evolution and clinical outcomes
* Pain measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) * Ankle function measured using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale * Level of activity measured using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale * Quality of life measured using the EQ5D™ questionnaire * Arthritis status of adjacent joints measured using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale * Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
the decision criteria for choosing the surgical technique use
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Sint Lucas Andreas Ziekenhuis
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Hospital Pedro Hispano
Matosinhos Municipality, Portugal
Hospital clinico y provincial
Barcelona, Spain
Musgrave Park Hospital
Belfast, United Kingdom
Reason for choosing the Total ANkle Arthroplasty or Tibiotalar Arthrodesis
Time frame: inclusion