Cervical cancer remains a public health burden, particularly in developing countries such as sub-saharan Africa where the infrastructure for organized screening programs does not exist. As a result, other screening modalities (visual inspection with acetic acid) are the standard of care in such regions. It is now known, persistent infection with an oncogenic Human papillomavirus (HPV) type is a necessary precursor of cervical cancer and evidence is showing HPV testing is a potential, safe and effective alternative to cytology testing (The Pap smear). This study is evaluating the feasibility and acceptance of HPV self-collection vs. VIA in a cohort of women from Kisenyi, Uganda.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
500
Women will self-collect a cervical sample that will be provided to an outreach worker and then labelled and sent to laboratories in Kampala for HPV testing. Women who test positive for HPV will be contacted by phone and provided with follow-up instructions.
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Histologically confirmed cervical intra-epithelial lesions grade 2 (CIN2) or greater in self-collected HPV arm and VIA arm at 12 months by colposcopy
Presence of low grade (CIN1) or moderate to high grade lesions (CIN2 or greater) will be compared between the two groups using chi-square testing at month 12.
Time frame: At the 12 month follow-up visit
Uptake of HPV self-collection compared to VIA in women in Kampala, Uganda
Proportion of women who provide HPV self collected specimen or who attend initial VIA will be compared between groups using Pearson's Chi-square test. Proportion of women who complete all recommended follow-up assessments and treatment (if required) will be compared between groups using chi-square testing.
Time frame: One Year
Prevalence rates of high-risk HPV in the self-collection arm.
Time frame: One year
Assess screen positive rates by nurse-midwife exam in VIA arm
Time frame: One year
Evaluation of adverse events or complications documented at time of sample collection, 4-6 weeks after cryotherapy and at 12 and 36 months by study questionnaire
Time frame: 36 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.