The purpose of this research study is to evaluate if the study drug, ACTH Gel helps decrease the disease symptoms in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) who are already taking medications prescribed by their physician and are still experiencing disease symptoms. ACTH gel has been a Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis since 1952, and in 2010 the FDA retained RA as a disease approved for ACTH gel use. Despite its FDA approval there is very limited data on its how well ACTH gel works in improving the symptoms of people with RA.
This study is for people who are currently taking a biologic therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis and who are still experiencing symptoms. Subjects are given the ACTH gel to take twice each week for 12 weeks as a supplement to current therapies. Subjects are required to visit the clinic for a baseline visit, at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks. We will obtain a blood sample for research purposes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
18
Subjects are given the ACTHAR gel subcutaneously twice per week for 12 weeks.
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Between Week 0 and Week 12
percentage of participants achieving \>20% improvement in CDAI after 12 weeks of therapy (\>20% reduction in CDAI relative to baseline based on ratio of CDAI at week 12 to CDAI at week 0: CDAI Week 12/CDAI Week 0 \< 0.8 meets criteria for improvement, as lower CDAI scores represent lower disease activity)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP) Between Week 0 and Week 12
Change in the Disease Activity Score 28-CRP (DAS28-CRP) at week 12 relative to baseline (week 0), where lower DAS28-CRP scores at week 12 represent improvement. Scale: 0-8.61 (lower scores indicate reduced disease activity)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Changes in Acute Phase Reactants (CRP) Between Week 0 and Week 12
Changes in C-reactive protein value (mg/dl): reduction in CRP values at week 12 relative to week 0 represents improvement (week 12 CRP-baseline CRP \< 0))
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in Acute Phase Reactants (ESR) Between Week 0 and Week 12
Change in ESR--reduction in ESR at week 12 relative to baseline (week 0) represents improvement (week 12 ESR - baseline ERS \< 0)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Patient Reported Changes in Fatigue Between Week 0 and Week 12
The FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) scoring metric assesses fatigue using 13 questions rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no fatigue)-4 (severe fatigue); total scores range from 0-52, with higher total scores representing more severe fatigue. The difference in FACIT-F scores between weeks 12 and week 0 (calculated as FACIT-F score week 12 minus FACIT-F score at week 0) indicates changes in fatigue relative to baseline, where reduction of FACIT-F score at week 12 represents improvement in fatigue.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 12 weeks