Treatment of Chronic Pain From Osteoarthritis

Phase 4WithdrawnNCT02032927

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia

Overview

Osteoarthritis is a common joint disorder in the elder population.The current treatment options include both a non-pharmacological approach (physiokinesitherapy, diet) or if this fails, a pharmacological approach that relies in the first instance on drugs such as paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (including inhibitors of cyclo-oxygenase). However, the use of these drugs is limited, by the roof effect concerning analgesia, and by the potential side effects. When pharmacological treatments with non-opioid medications fail, and a moderate-to-severe pain reduces the quality of life of the patient, international guidelines suggest the use of opioid drugs.

The WHO analgesic ladder, even with its limitations, is widely used to guide the beginning of opioid therapy in chronic pain. According to this approach the choice of drug is based on the intensity of pain reported by the patient; belong to the first step acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and if these drugs fail it is planned to introduce a weak opioid (tramadol, codeine) alone or in combination. The association codeine-paracetamol, one of the most widely used drug combinations in the treatment of moderate pain from osteoarthritis, demonstrated analgesic efficacy superior only to paracetamol in the short term; however, its use was less effective in the long term and worsen by multiple side effects, especially gastrointestinal with results in poor adherence to the therapy. Lately, the international guidelines on the treatment of chronic pain in cancer have suggested the possibility of moving, in case of inadequate efficacy of paracetamol and / or NSAIDs, directly to the third step, using a low dose of a strong opioid. The side effects associated with the use of opioids in the treatment of chronic pain, such as itching, side effects of gastrointestinal and central nervous system effects (drowsiness, giddiness), often necessitate dose reduction (thus compromising the analgesic effect), with often resulting in discontinuation of treatment. A recent strategy to face the underlying cause of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the oral administration of an antagonist of opioid receptor that acts specifically and locally at the level of the gastrointestinal tract. This prevents or minimizes gastrointestinal side effects but does not affect the central analgesic effect of the opioid thank to the low bioavailability of the antagonist. A recent review on the effects of chronic pain on cognitive function of patients describes a series of clinical evidence suggestive of a intellectual impairment predominantly associated with a significant psychomotor slowing. An interesting corollary of the problematic pain-cognition is represented by the possible neuropsychological side effect due to teh use of opioid drugs in the treatment of chronic pain. The objective of the research becomes to determinate how much the analgesic relief, derived from the assumption of opioid drugs, can lead to an improvement in cognitive function without the possible side effects of the drugs themselves.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Interventions

Codeine/paracetamolDRUG

Randomization to one of the two treatments will be done through appropriate randomization list. During the first 15 days of treatment in the event of failure of efficacy, understood as the average pain intensity higher than 4 (monitored with NRS) with the need to take more than two rescue doses of paracetamol per day, and in the absence of side effects, the patients will be instructed on how to proceed with dosage adjustments according to specific guidelines. The patient will be evaluated at 15 days, 1 month, 2 months and three months. Your health care professional who administer the assessment scales (WOMAC, SF-12, BFI, TMT) will not know in any way which treatment the patient is taking.

Oxycodone/naloxoneDRUG

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 60 YearsMax age: 100 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects over the age of 60 years old * Individuals with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis * Subject that are able to understand the purpose of the study and that have signed a written informed consent * Subjects that are able to take prescribed therapies, understand and complete the questionnaires and forms Exclusion Criteria: * Subject with history of hypersensitivity to oxycodone, naloxone , codeine , acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and the other ingredients in the formulations studied * Subjects with known structural alterations in the gastrointestinal tract * Subjects with secondary osteoarthritis * Subjects with history of abuse of alcohol and / or drugs * Subjects with history of abuse opioids. * Patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis * Patients with evidence of medical or surgical unstable * Patients with current or previous history of epilepsy * Patients treated with anti-depressive action on the central nervous system which in the opinion of the investigator may result in additive effects with the drugs under study. * Subjects with renal and / or hepatic impairment severe * Subjects with a history of depression or other psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the investigator might interfere with the study participation * Individuals with cognitive impairment

Locations (14)

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

Pavia, Pavia, Italy

Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Pavia - Ospedale "Carlo Mira" - U.O. Medicina Interna - Servizio di Anestesia e Rianimazione - Ambulatorio di Terapia del dolore

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Evaluate differences in terms of efficacy and tolerability between two pharmaceutical protocols in patients with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis.

The number of patients has been estimated considering that, at 15 days of enrollment, a reduction of 30% of the WOMAC pain subscale, with a score at BFI \<50, the use of not more than one laxative drug or the absence of side effects such as to consider the need to discontinue therapy occurs in 80% of patients in Protocol B versus 50% of patients in Protocol A, with 73 patients per group will be able to highlight an odds ratio (OR) 2.65 with a power of 80% and an alpha error of 5% (2-tailed). The calculation was performed with nQuery 4 (Statistical Solutions, Cork, IRL). Considering a drop out rate of about 24% is numerosity you plan to enroll a total of 182 patients in order to obtain 146 patients valid.

Time frame: 15 days from the enrolment

Secondary Outcomes

Evaluate the differences between the two drug protocols, in terms of quality of life, by using of the SF-12 questionnaire.

Time frame: 3 months from the enrollment

Evaluation of the differences between the two drug protocols, in the scores obtained in the two sections, functionality and rigidity of the WOMAC questionnaire.

Time frame: 3 months from the enrollment

The evaluation of the attentive functions (selective and divided attention) and of eye-manual coordination and of psycho-motor speed will be performed trough Trail Making Test (Reitan, 1944) to all patients enrolled for the project.

The secondary endpoints, all on a continuous scale, will be analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test; for each group will be reported median and quartiles.

Time frame: 3 months from the enrollment

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.