Isolated surgical repair of the inside portion of the tibia may be enough to stabilize an ankle fracture in which both the tibia and the fibula are broken. This would alleviate the need for another incision, plate, and screws to repair the fibula. The purpose of this study is to help determine if surgically repairing only the tibia fracture will lead to equivalent clinical outcomes when compared with surgical repair of both bones. The hypothesis of this study is that operative stabilization of the medial malleolus fracture only, in otherwise ligamentously stable bimalleolar and/or trimalleolar fractures of the ankle, will lead to equivalent clinical outcomes and functional scores as those treated with operative stabilization of both malleoli and/or all malleoli.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Randomized to "nonsurgical": patient will receive surgical treatment of the inside portion (medial malleolus) of the tibia fracture only; the fibula fracture (and posterior malleolus fracture, if present) will be closed reduced (not repaired surgically).
Randomized to "surgical": patient will receive surgical treatment of both the inside portion (medial malleolus) of the tibia fracture, as well as the fibula fracture (lateral malleolus). Fixation of the posterior side of the tibia (posterior malleolus) may or may not be performed based upon intraoperative x-rays.
Erlanger Health System
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
clinical outcomes
Time to union (radiographic healing of the fracture), Time to weight-bearing, Complications
Time frame: one year
functional outcomes
Measured by the SF-36 Health Survey and the Foot Function Index
Time frame: one year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.