Prospective multicenters randomized study to compare the efficiency and the socioeconomic impact of the endoscopic management (Overstitch technique) of weight regain after gastric bypass surgery to non invasive treatment
Nowadays morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40kg/m²) is a major problem of public health in industrialized countries. About 500 000 patients would be affected by this disease in France in 2009. Prevalence of the morbid obesity raised from 0.3 % (± 0.1 %) of the population in 1997 to 1.1 % (± 0.1 %) in 2009 (Extrapolation of the data ObEpi on 2009 to the French population) (1). For this type of patient, the only long-term effective treatment recognized by the scientists is the bariatric surgery. (2-4) Roux and Y Gastric Bypass (GBP) is a consensual procedure, that has been described in the sixties, in this indication (approximately 11000 GBP performed in FRance in 2012 (5,6). This operation consists on the creation of a proximal gastric pouch (50 cc). A Roux and Y intestinal loop will be added to create a malabsorptive part. 60 to 80 % of excess weight loss described in the literature in the long-terms. Furthermore, improvement or remission of T2DM, sleep apnea syndrome, arterial hyperpressure, dyslipidemia) are emphasized in many trials (5, 7). However 15 to 20 % of the handled patients present a weight regain 5 years post surgery potentially explained by the dilation of the gastric pouch or the gastro jejunal anastomosis and thus a decrease of the restrictive effect. (8-11) To palliate this complication two solutions are described. (12-15; 19) The first one consists in a recalibration of the gastric poouch by surgical approachy. In this case, a ring of silicone or polypropylene can be positioned around the gastric pocket. Other possible solution is to redo a new gastrojejunostomy with a smaller size, by surgical access (laparotomy or laparoscopy). These interventions are very delicate because of important peritoneal adhesions and present a rate of significant morbidity especially if they are performed under laparotomy. The pure medical care does not allow long-term results stable. ²² A therapeutic dead end is reported often for this type of patient. A new possibility was recently described. (17-18) A recalibration can be realized by sutures performed under endoscopic approach at the level of the gastro jejunal anastomosis or from the gastric pouch by the APOLLO Endosurgery OverStitch. The digestive surgery by endoscopic way is rapidly expanding. The first results seem to be promising (resumed the weight loss) but owe to be estimated in a randomized study comparing this new process with the medical conventional treatment. A single-blind, randomized, forward-looking study, multicenter, comparative between two parallel groups of patients presenting a weight regain after GBP was thus organized. The main objective is to estimate the efficiency of the APOLLO Endosurgery OverStitch technique versus the non-interventional strategy. The secondary endpoints is to study the morbidity of the procedure, the evolution of quality of life of the patients, the medical economic impact of the innovation in 24 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
74
Patients will get the usual endoscopy used for diagnosis. In addition, they will receive an endoscopic surgery using the APOLLO Endosuregery technique. The Apollo Endosurgery OverStitch is an endoscopic equipment which involves the suturing by endogastric way to decrease the size of the anastomosis gastrojujenal or gastric pouch
Patients will get the usual endoscopy used for diagnosis.
Louis Mourier Hospital
Colombes, France
Lille Hospital
Lille, France
Montpellier Hospital
Montpellier, France
Nice Hospital
Nice, France
Weight loss assessment of Apollo Endosurgery OverStitch technical
The main objective is to compare the efficacy of endoscopic surgery Apollo Endosurgery OverStitch technical than the conventional non-interventional strategy in patients with weight regain after gastric bypass.Moreover, all of these patients will also benefit from the medical-nutritional usual care.
Time frame: At 12 and 24 months after surgery
Comparison of both strategies on tolerance (adverse events and serious adverse events)
The secondary objectives of this study were to compare in real life these both strategies of the management of weight regain after gastric bypass on tolerance and safety related to obesity.
Time frame: At 12 months after Baseline and at each visit
Comparison of both strategies on comorbidities
The secondary objectives of this study were to compare in real life these both strategies of the management of weight regain after gastric bypass on comorbidities related to obesity (type 2 diabetes, arterial hypertension, sleep apnea syndrome, ...).
Time frame: At 12 months after Baseline and at each visit
Comparison of both strategies on quality of life
The secondary objectives of this study were to compare in real life these both strategies of the management of weight regain after gastric bypass on quality of life.
Time frame: At 12 months after Baseline and at each visit
Comparison of both strategies on medico-economic impact (drugs fees, medical consultation fees..)
The secondary objectives of this study were to compare in real life these both strategies of the management of weight regain after gastric bypass on medico-economic impact of innovation. Moreover, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed at the end of this study.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
HEGP Hospital
Paris, France
Strasbourg Hospital
Strasbourg, France
Villeurbanne clinic
Villeurbanne, France
Time frame: At 12 months after Baseline and at each visit