Trends in organ donor pool are characterized by an increasing age and a shift towards cerebrovascular diseases as primary causes of death. As a result, donors older than 60 years nowadays represent more than one fourth of the entire donor pool in Italy. This, along with an increasing number of patients on the waiting list for transplantation, prompted a growing use of organs from subjects older than 60 years that would have been considered unsuitable years ago. To improve graft outcomes, transplant of two older kidneys in the same recipient has been proposed. To optimize allocation of these organs to single or dual transplantation,a scoring system for kidneys, based on biopsy, with scores ranging from a minimum of 0 (indicating the absence of renal lesions) to a maximum of 12 (indicating the presence of marked changes in the renal parenchyma) has been suggested. According to this panel, kidneys with a score of 4 or lower are predicted to contain enough viable nephrons to be used as single transplants, those with a score of 5, 6, or 7 can be used as dual transplants, kidneys with a score greater than 7 are discarded. The survival of kidney grafts obtained from donors older than 60 years and allocated for single or dual transplantation on the basis of biopsy findings before transplantation was similar to that of single grafts from younger donors. To further improve these results, set-up of strategies to preserve organs is crucial to save the residual nephron mass and optimize outcomes of these marginal grafts. In this regard, over the past 30 years two methods of kidney preservation have been developed. With cold storage, the kidney is flushed once it is removed from the donor and placed in an ice-cooled container with preservation solution. With the use of pulsatile machine perfusion, the kidney is connected to a machine, which pumps a cold solution containing oxygen and nutrients through the kidney. This process allows for metabolism to continue in the kidney with end products being removed. The broad aim of the present study is to evaluate whether pulsatile machine perfusion of kidneys from older/marginal donors may provide better outcomes than static perfusion. To this purpose the outcome of recipients of perfused kidneys will be compared with the outcome of historical controls receiving non-perfused kidney selected and allocated on the basis of the same criteria and matched by gender, age and kidney histologic score.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
60
A.O. Papa Giovanni XXIII - U.O. Nefrologia e Dialisi/U.O. Chirurgia Pediatrica
Bergamo, Italy
IRCCS Policlinico S.Matteo - UOS trapianto di Rene/U.O. Nefrologia
Pavia, Italy
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
Time frame: 6 months after transplant.
Renal resistance
Renal resistance is measured by graft ultrasound. It ranges from 0 to 1.
Time frame: 6 hours after pulsatile machine perfusion
Correlation between renal resistance measured at 6 hours after machine perfusion and renal histological score at pre-transplant biopsy
The severity of changes in kidney at pre-transplant biopsy was quantified by a predefined histologic score. Changes in each evaluated component of the kidney tissue , vessels, glomeruli, tubules, and connective tissue, received a score ranging from 0 to 3. The sum of these scores was defined as the global kidney score, which could range from 0 to 12. Renal resistance is measured by graft ultrasound. It ranges from 0 to 1.
Time frame: 6 hours after pulsatile machine perfusion
Correlation between renal resistances measured at 6 hours after pulsatile machine perfusion and intergraft resistances measured by ultrasound at 7 days and 6 months after transplant.
Renal resistances are measured by graft ultrasound. They range from 0 to 1.
Time frame: Changes from 7 days at 6 months after transplant .
Incidence of delayed graft function (DGF).
Time frame: Within the first week after transplant
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.