The main objective of this study is to compare on day 0 the maximum Lyapunov exponent (lmax, an indicator of local dynamic stability) of chronic low back pain patients versus that of healthy volunteers matched for age (± 5 years), sex and body mass index (BMI ± 15% of low back pain patients).
The secondary objectives of this study are: To compare lmax in the different experimental conditions within each group (chronic lower back pain patients, healthy volunteers). To compare changes in lmax for low back pain patients at D7 and 6 weeks.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
70
The movement required is a flexion - extension where the subject touches a target (adapted to his/her morphology) with both index fingers: the target is positioned in front of the subject, inline with his/her outstretched arms and at knee height. This movement simulates a lifting task without weight. The movement is repeated 30 times with a return to the initial position at a frequency of 0.32Hz.
The movement required of the subject is a rotational movement where the subject alternately touches with his/her left and right hands two targets. The latter are positioned horizontally on either side of the subject at shoulder height and at arm's length. The movement is repeated 30 times at a frequency of 0.28 Hz.
CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, France
the Lyapunov exponent (lmax, an indicator of local dynamic stability)
for flexion-extension movements The maximum Lyapunov exponent (lmax) is used to characterise local dynamic stability as in Rosenstein et al 1993 and Dingwell \& Kang 2007.
Time frame: Day 0 (baseline)
the Lyapunov exponent (lmax, an indicator of local dynamic stability)
for rotational movements. The maximum Lyapunov exponent (lmax) is used to characterise local dynamic stability as in Rosenstein et al 1993 and Dingwell \& Kang 2007.
Time frame: Day 0 (baseline)
the Lyapunov exponent (lmax, an indicator of local dynamic stability)
for complex movements. The maximum Lyapunov exponent (lmax) is used to characterise local dynamic stability as in Rosenstein et al 1993 and Dingwell \& Kang 2007.
Time frame: Day 0 (baseline)
the Lyapunov exponent (lmax, an indicator of local dynamic stability)
for flexion-extension movements. The maximum Lyapunov exponent (lmax) is used to characterise local dynamic stability as in Rosenstein et al 1993 and Dingwell \& Kang 2007.
Time frame: day 7
the Lyapunov exponent (lmax, an indicator of local dynamic stability)
for flexion-extension movements. The maximum Lyapunov exponent (lmax) is used to characterise local dynamic stability as in Rosenstein et al 1993 and Dingwell \& Kang 2007.
Time frame: week 6
the Lyapunov exponent (lmax, an indicator of local dynamic stability)
for rotational movements. The maximum Lyapunov exponent (lmax) is used to characterise local dynamic stability as in Rosenstein et al 1993 and Dingwell \& Kang 2007.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The subject is required to successively touch 4 targets situated (i) at knee height to the left of the subject, (ii) at shoulder height to the right of the subject, (iii) at shoulder height to the left of the patient, and (iv) at knee height to the right of the patient. The movement is repeated 30 times at a frequency of 0.16 Hz.
Time frame: day 7
the Lyapunov exponent (lmax, an indicator of local dynamic stability)
for rotational movements. The maximum Lyapunov exponent (lmax) is used to characterise local dynamic stability as in Rosenstein et al 1993 and Dingwell \& Kang 2007.
Time frame: week 6
the Lyapunov exponent (lmax, an indicator of local dynamic stability)
for complex movements. The maximum Lyapunov exponent (lmax) is used to characterise local dynamic stability as in Rosenstein et al 1993 and Dingwell \& Kang 2007.
Time frame: day 7
the Lyapunov exponent (lmax, an indicator of local dynamic stability)
for complex movements. The maximum Lyapunov exponent (lmax) is used to characterise local dynamic stability as in Rosenstein et al 1993 and Dingwell \& Kang 2007.
Time frame: week 6