The purpose of this project is to compare operative repair of traumatically torn rotator cuff tendon with physiotherapy in a randomized prospective study.
In clinical practice most patients with a traumatic acute rotator cuff tear are treated with operative repair. The results of surgery are in most cases good but there are also good results in the literature from conservative treatment. So far there has been no prospective randomized comparison between the two treatments. When it comes to degenerative non-traumatic tears, level 1 and 2 studies have not been able to show the superiority of surgery. This study takes place in 2 clinics in Sweden (Linköping and Kalmar). Patients who have no previous shoulder conditions, a trauma to the shoulder and pain and/or inability to lift their arm will undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). If this indicates a full-thickness rotator cuff tear of the cranial part of the rotator cuff the patient will be randomized to surgery or physiotherapy. Surgical intervention is mini-open repair. Follow-up takes place at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months with patient scores taken by a blinded independent physiotherapist. At 12 months a new MRI is conducted as well.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
50
Physiotherapy \& Surgery
Orthopedic Clinic, Linköping University Hospital
Linköping, Sweden
RECRUITINGConstant-Murley Shoulder Assessment score
Time frame: Twelve months
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff score
Shoulder specific, patient reported outcome score
Time frame: Twelve months
MRI
Magnetic Resonance imaging. Gives a measure of muscle atrophy, fatty infiltration, rerupture and enlargement of the tendon rupture.
Time frame: Twelve months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.