The objective of this study is to compare the possible time savings from reduction of nursing and pharmacy time to manage AEGC patients using capecitabine-based regimens versus traditional intravenous chemotherapy in the Hong Kong public hospital setting.
Advanced esophageal and gastric cancer (AEGC) have ranked in the top 10 cancer-related cause of death worldwide, with approximately one million new cases each year. Over half of new cases are in East Asia. The traditional chemotherapy for AEGC remains on intravenous (IV) fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin, and the anthracyclines. Trials favoured the combined use of 5-FU and cisplatin for superior efficacy and quality of life in AEGC patients. Recent years, oral chemotherapy has a more practical and economic advantages over IV regimen. It is understandable that patients prefer oral regimens as long as the clinical efficacy is maintained. Oral treatment strategy preserves quality of life for AEGC patients. In addition, it may also have additional cost saving in the nursing and pharmacy time. It is because a significant amount of time can be saved in both nursing and pharmacy for the preparation and administration of IV chemotherapy However, there is a lack of local data to demonstrate the impact of pharmacy and nursing care utilizing capecitabine-based regimen comparing to traditional IV chemotherapy in MCRC patients of Hong Kong.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Composite preparation, dispensing, and administration time
This is a time-and-motion study conducted in 2 public hospitals of Hong Kong based on the simulation of previously data on both capecitabine-based regimen (XELOX and XP) and IV 5-FU-based regimen (FOLFOX and FP)
Time frame: Up to 6 months after initiation of chemotherapy
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.