The objective of this study is to better characterize the mechanisms of action of fluoxetine in motor recovery and more specifically to identify the neurophysiological substrate underlying fluoxetine-induced motor recovery in stroke. In this study, the investigators propose to use transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess the effect of a chronic treatment of fluoxetine on corticospinal excitability and integrity.
Recently, a phase IIb clinical trial (Chollet et al., 2011 - FLAME study) revealed that early administration of standard-dose oral fluoxetine (a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor widely used as antidepressant) to patients with subacute ischaemic stroke and moderate to severe motor deficit in the upper extremity enhanced motor recovery after 3 months, as assessed by the Fugl-Meyer motor scale, suggesting that fluoxetine could be a promising drug to promote recovery in stroke patients. However, the mechanisms, and their specificity, by which fluoxetine improves motor function after stroke remain poorly understood. The overall objective of this proposal is to better characterize the mechanisms of action of fluoxetine in motor recovery and more specifically to identify the neurophysiological substrate underlying fluoxetine-induced motor recovery in stroke. The corticospinal system plays a key role in voluntary activation of upper limb muscles. Its integrity has been related to spontaneous (but incomplete) recovery after stroke. So far, the effect of fluoxetine on corticospinal excitability and integrity has been poorly explored although this drug appears promising to promote motor recovery. In this study, the investigators propose to use transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess the effect of a chronic treatment of fluoxetine on corticospinal excitability and integrity. The investigators believe that this approach will be suitable to determine the mechanisms of action of this drug on motor recovery after stroke. The investigators will assess in a double-blind, monocentric (Saint-Anne Hospital Stroke center), randomised, placebo-controlled study, the effect of a chronic treatment of fluoxetine on corticospinal excitability and integrity using TMS in 40 patients suffering from ischaemic stroke with hemiplegia or hemiparesis affecting motor hand functions. By coupling TMS, visuomotor grip tracking task and several clinical scales, the investigators' results will allow a more system-specific assessment than the Fugl-Meyer motor scale of fluoxetine-induced motor hand recovery in stroke. We believe that this study will support the beneficial effect of fluoxetine to promote motor recovery in stroke and will open new vistas for treatment options using fluoxetine in patients with motor impairments. It is expected that this study will provide preliminary data that will be subsequently used to design new, more focused, clinical trials.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
6
1 pill of 20mg / day, during 3 months
1 pill of 20mg/day, during 3 months
Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne
Paris, France
Slope of the curve of recruitment of the PEMs
Significant difference, between the treated group and the group control, of the slope of the curve of recruitment of the PEMs between the beginning (D0) and the end of the treatment (processing) (M3).
Time frame: M3
Slope of recruitment of the PEMs
Effect of a first dose of fluoxétine on the slope of recruitment of the PEMs.
Time frame: D0, M3, M6
Slope of recruitment of the PEMs
Persistence of fluoxétine effect on the slope of recruitment of the PEMs to M6.
Time frame: D0, M3, M6
Index finger force control in paretic hand under time-course of treatment of Fluoxetine
A visuomotor tracking task is used to measure accuracy of force control (NewtonSecond, Ns) and time taken to release force (release duration, ms). Performance between time-points will be measured (Ns, before-after treatment). Effects of fluoxetine on force control parameters (e.g., accuracy and release duration) in paretic hand.
Time frame: D0, M3, M6
in index finger force control in non-paretic hand under time-course of treatment of Fluoxetine
Same visuomotor tracking mesures as above but acquired in non-paretic hand. Effects of fluoxetine on the non-affected hand (error, Ns; release duration, ms).
Time frame: D0, M3, M6
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.