To compare insertion characteristics of 2 different supraglottic devices (Guardian LMA and Proseal LMA) and to observe any associated complications.
Condition: The study focuses on the comparison of the ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, fiberoptic position and ease of gastric tube placement between the Guardian LMA and the LMA Proseal in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Device: Guardian Laryngeal Mask Device: LMA Proseal Study Type: Interventional Study Design: Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
80
Guardian Laryngeal Mask: The Guardian Laryngeal Mask (Ultimate Medical Pty Ltd, Richmond, Vic, Australia) is a new silicone-based single-use extraglottic airway device that forms a seal with the glottis for ventilation and with the hypopharynx for airway protection, and provides a gastric drainage port. In addition, it has a port for suctioning material from the hypopharynx and a pilot balloon valve that constantly monitors intracuff pressure. In the following randomized, non-crossover study, the investigators test if oropharyngeal leak pressures differed between the Guardian Laryngeal Mask and the LMA proseal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway: Silicon based, reusable, modified dorsal cuff and drainage tube
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
Oropharyngeal Seal Pressure
This will be measured over the full range of cuff volumes (0-40 ml) and at an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O.
Time frame: 5 min
Anatomic Position
This will be determined fiberscopically via the airway tube over the full range of cuff volumes and at an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O.
Time frame: 5 min
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.