Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Response-adapted Strategy in Follicular Lymphoma

Overview

Recently, the availability of R has substantially changed therapeutic approach to FL patients, since its combination with chemotherapy has improved response rates, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Based on the results of recently completed randomized studies the standard treatment for patients with FL should consist of an initial therapy with R-CHOP combination followed by two-year maintenance with R. Although results of randomized trials confirmed that this approach results in an improved patients' outcome and made a step forward in the management of patients with FL, one important question that can be raised is if this approach is really needed for all patients with FL or if some of them could benefit from a reduced intensity treatment achieving the same results in terms of outcome and survival . This question is of particular interest for newly diagnosed patients for whom maintenance does not affect OS. More recent data demonstrated that the outcome of patients with FL can be further predicted by evaluating the quality of response to therapy studying minimal residual disease (MRD). This project addresses the objective of evaluating if combining clinical response assessed on FDG-PET scan and molecular response measured through MRD detection could permit to single out groups of patients at different risk of progression and to consequently modulate maintenance therapies, with the aim to provide clinicians a more rational use of the available diagnostic and therapeutic resources.

This is a multicenter, randomized, phase III, superiority study comparing standard vs response driven approach to maintenance. Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with naïve, untreated follicular lymphoma, stage II-IV, Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index 2 (FLIPI2) \>0 requiring a therapeutic intervention will be recruited and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either standard or experimental arm. All patients will receive the same induction therapy with 6 cycles of R-CHOP or R-bendamustine and 2 additional doses of Rituximab. At baseline patients will be assessed for molecular status and staged by means of CT scan. A baselineFluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) scan should also be performed. At the end of chemoimmunotherapy all patients will be assessed for disease response by common clinical and laboratory examination, CT scan and FDG-PET. An intermediate assessment of response with CT scan and FDG-PET (optional) will also be performed after the first four courses of R-chemoimmunotherapy. At the end of induction therapy the status of minimal residual disease will be also evaluated. After induction treatment all responding patients in the standard arm will receive standard maintenance therapy with Rituximab (every 2 months for 2 years), while patients in the experimental arm will be subdivided into two risk groups and assigned to different post induction treatments based on FDG-PET and MRD results. In both arms, patients with stable or progressive disease (PET positive and less than PR on CT scan) will be addressed to salvage treatment chosen at physician discretion. In the experimental arm, risk group allocation will be performed primarily on the basis of FDG-PET results: * Group 1 (low risk): negative FDG-PET * Group 2 (high risk): positive FDG-PET Patients at low risk (FDG-PET negative) will received maintenance therapy according to their MRD status,particularly: * Group 1a (MRD negative): observation * Group 1b (MRD positive): pre-emptive Rituximab therapy Patient at high risk (FDG-PET positive) will receive maintenance regardless of their MRD status: · Group 2: intensified maintenance ((90)Y Ibritumomab Tiuxetan + Rituximab maintenance )