The primary objective of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of multiple doses of upadacitinib versus placebo in adults with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on stable background methotrexate therapy who had not shown an adequate response to methotrexate alone.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
300
Tablets for oral administration
Tablets for oral administration
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12
A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician's global assessment of disease activity * Patient's global assessment of disease activity * Patient's assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12
A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
C.V. Mehta MD, Med Corporation /ID# 126380
Hemet, California, United States
Omega Research Consultants, LLC /ID# 125780
DeBary, Florida, United States
Lovelace Scientific Resources /ID# 127324
Venice, Florida, United States
North Georgia Rheumatology Grp /ID# 125779
Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States
PRN Professional Research Network of Kansas, LLC /ID# 126148
Wichita, Kansas, United States
The Center for Rheumatology & /ID# 127323
Wheaton, Maryland, United States
Summit Medical Group /ID# 125776
Clifton, New Jersey, United States
Arthritis and Osteo Assoc /ID# 134994
Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States
Altoona Ctr Clinical Res /ID# 125777
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
Emkey Arthritis and Osteo Clin /ID# 134716
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States
...and 53 more locations
The disease activity score-28-CRP (DAS28 \[CRP\]) assesses RA disease activity based on a continuous scale of combined measures of 28 tender joint counts (TJC28), 28 swollen joint counts (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP), and the patient global assessment of disease activity (measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 mm). DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10 where higher scores indicate more disease activity. LDA is defined as a DAS28(CRP) score \< 3.2.
Time frame: Week 12
Secondary: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12
The disease activity score-28-CRP (DAS28 \[CRP\]) assesses RA disease activity based on a continuous scale of combined measures of 28 tender joint counts (TJC28), 28 swollen joint counts (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP), and the patient global assessment of disease activity (measured on a visual analog scale from 0 to 100 mm). DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to 10 where higher scores indicate more disease activity. CR is defined as a DAS28(CRP) score \< 2.6.
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on CDAI at Week 12
The clinical disease activity index (CDAI) is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. LDA is defined as a CDAI score ≤ 10.
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on CDAI at Week 12
The clinical disease activity index (CDAI) is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. CR is defined as a CDAI score ≤ 2.8.
Time frame: Week 12