The purpose of the study is to determine whether clonidine gel is an effective treatment for reducing the pain associated with painful diabetic neuropathy.
Study CLO 290 was a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, 2 arm parallel group study of Clonidine Gel in the treatment of pain associated with PDN. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 of 2 treatments applied topically TID to both feet for 85 days: Clonidine Gel (3.9 mg of clonidine HCl total daily dose), or Placebo Gel (vehicle without clonidine). Approximately 140 adult subjects with symmetrical distal PDN were expected to be randomized into the study. However, a pre-planned fully blinded interim analysis was performed when 70 subjects had completed the study for the purpose of re estimating sample size. Following the recommendation of the independent, third party statistician who conducted the interim analysis, the sample size was adjusted to allow approximately 260 subjects to be randomized into the study. The study included 5 phases: Screening Phase (up to 21 days duration), Baseline Phase (Day 14 to Day 8), Placebo Lead in Phase (Day -7 to Day 1), Double blind Treatment Phase (85 days), and a Post-treatment Follow up Phase (7 days, only for subjects not enrolling in the open label long term safety study, CLO 311).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
260
Unnamed facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unnamed facility
Santa Monica, California, United States
Change From Baseline to Day 84 (Week 12) in Numeric Pain Rating Scale Score
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a single reading that measures the patients interpretation of their pain on a scale from 0, no pain to 10, worst pain imaginable. The change from baseline can range from -10 to 10. The change from Baseline (averaged over Day -14 to Day -8) to End-of-Treatment (averaged over Days 78 to 84 \[±3 days\]) in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale score assessing the "average pain in the past 24 hours in the painful areas of the feet" averaged over Days 78 to 84 compared to the 7 days at the Baseline Phase (Days -14 to -8). For the primary efficacy endpoint, the mean change in pain intensity from Baseline to Week 12 was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the Baseline pain intensity score serving as a covariate. The statistical model also included treatment, site, site by treatment interaction, and strata. If the site by treatment interaction term was not significant at the 0.1 level, then it was excluded from the model.
Time frame: The change from Baseline (averaged over Day -14 to Day -8) to End-of-Treatment (averaged over Days 78 to 84 [±3 days])
Mean Daily Worst Pain Intensity Numeric Pain Rating Scale Scores
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a single reading that measures the patients interpretation of their pain on a scale from 0, no pain to 10, worst pain imaginable. The change from baseline can range from -10 to 10. The change from Baseline (worst score from Day -14 to Day -8) to End-of-Treatment (worst score during Days 78 to 84 \[±3 days\]) in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale score assessing the "worst pain in the past 24 hours in the painful areas of the feet" from Days 78 to 84 compared to the 7 days at the Baseline Phase (Days -14 to -8). For the endpoint, the change in worst pain intensity from Baseline to Week 12 was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the Baseline worst pain intensity score serving as a covariate. The statistical model also included treatment, site, site by treatment interaction, and strata. If the site by treatment interaction term was not significant at the 0.1 level, then it was excluded from the model.
Time frame: The change from Baseline (worse over Day -14 to Day -8) to End-of-Treatment (worse over Days 78 to 84 [±3 days])
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Unnamed facility
Walnut Creek, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Milford, Connecticut, United States
Unnamed facility
Waterbury, Connecticut, United States
Unnamed facility
Bradenton, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Brandon, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Jupiter, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
...and 13 more locations