The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of 2 concentrations of OPA-15406 compared to vehicle in participants with atopic dermatitis (AD).
AD is a disease mainly characterized by pruritic eczema, and those with the disease experience repeated exacerbations and remissions. Therapeutic guidelines for the disease, currently being developed in many countries, all recognize AD as chronic eczema that is accompanied by the physiological dysfunction of the skin and in which inflammation is caused by various nonspecific stimuli or specific allergens. OPA 15406 is a type-4 phosphodiesterase (PDE4) inhibitor. PDE4 inhibitors are thought to be useful for allergic inflammatory diseases. This is a Phase 2 dose ranging study to evaluate the efficacy of two concentrations of OPA 15406 ointment compared to vehicle, when administered topically twice daily in participants with mild to moderate AD.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
121
OPA-15406 topical ointment
OPA-15406 1%-matching placebo topical ointment
Unnamed facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Percentage of Participants With Success in the Overall Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (IGA) Score at Week 4 [Using Non-responder Imputation or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)]
The IGA evaluation was performed by a certified rater. The IGA score, used to assess the overall disease severity, consists of a 6-point severity scale from clear to very severe disease (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease, and 5 = very severe disease). The IGA uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines for the overall severity assessment. The IGA assessment was performed for the overall selected treatment area(s): overall percentage body surface area to be treated and additionally for the target lesion. Success was defined as a score of 0 or 1 with at least a 2-grade reduction from Baseline. Participants without IGA score at Week 4 were treated as non-responders. In the sensitivity analysis, missing IGA score at Week 4 was imputed using LOCF method first and the success was defined based on the imputed IGA score.
Time frame: Week 4
Change From Baseline in Overall IGA Score at Week 4 [Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) Analysis]
The IGA evaluation was performed by a certified rater. The IGA allows for an assessment of overall disease severity at a given time point, and it consists of a 6-point severity scale from clear to very severe disease (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease, and 5 = very severe disease). The IGA uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines for the overall severity assessment. The IGA assessment was performed for the overall selected treatment area(s): overall percentage body surface area to be treated and additionally for the target lesion. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement in overall IGA score.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in Overall IGA Score at Week 4 [Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Analysis]
The IGA allows for an assessment of overall disease severity at a given time point, and it consists of a 6-point severity scale from clear to very severe disease (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease, and 5 = very severe disease). The IGA uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing, and crusting as guidelines for the overall severity assessment. Missing overall IGA scores at Week 4 were imputed using LOCF method. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement in overall IGA score.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Unnamed facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Denver, Colorado, United States
Unnamed facility
Orange Park, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States
Unnamed facility
Carmel, Indiana, United States
Unnamed facility
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Unnamed facility
Verona, New Jersey, United States
...and 20 more locations
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any event which resulted in death, was life-threatening, was a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, required in-patient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was another medically significant event.
Time frame: From signing of informed consent through Week 8