The aim of the current study is to compare the effictiveness of three different psychosocial therapies for treating functional disorders caused by indoor air problems.
Indoor air -related respiratory and other multiple organ symptoms are common in work environments in Finland. Symptoms effect on well-being and quality of life and may lead to impaired social and cognitive functioning and decreased work ability. All indoor air -related conditions are not explained by underlying physical factors and remain medically unexplained. Functional disorders are conditions where patients complain of multiple medically unexplained physical symptoms or physical problems don´t correlate with symptom severity. Indoor air -related symptoms and functional disorders are strongly associated to each other but there are no well-established diagnostic criteria for the condition . So far, there is no available treatment program to the indoor air -related symptoms to offer in primary or occupational health care services in Finland. In randomized controlled trials, cognitive behavioral treatment has shown to be effective for patients suffering from functional disorders. In addition, a relaxation technique entitled as applied relaxation (Tuomisto \& al, 1996) have shown to been shown to been effective to treat different kind of functional problems. There are no published trials on treatment for individuals of indoor air related symptomatology. The present study is designed as a pragmatic trial to investigate the effect of three different treatment programs as compared to treatment as usual (TAU) for indoor air- related problems in order to improve the (1) work capacity and (2) well-being. A secondary aim of the study is to identify psychological factors affecting the patients' response to the treatment. The patients are recruited from occupational health care services to establish and to evaluate the efficacy and usability of the treatment procedures. Participants will first undergo baseline assessment including medical examination of the respiratory symptoms. Then they are randomized to one of the study groups: TAU or one of the intervention groups. All study patients receive TAU at occupational health care services for their medical problems during the study. Patients randomized to the study groups receive also the intervention with TAU.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
75
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (Finland)
Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
15D - instrument
The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument (Sintonen, 2001)
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline
• Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
Self-report measure that assesses anxiety symptoms
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Self-report measure that assesses insomnia severity
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline
The Symptom checkList-90 (SCL-90)
Self-report measure that assesses general psychological and somatic symptoms and severity
Time frame: baseline, 6 and 12 months from the baseline
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Self-report measure that assesses depressive symptoms
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Self-report measure that assesses respiratory symptom severity
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline
The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-2 (AAQ-2)
Self-report measure focuses on experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline
Illness Worry Scale (IWS)
Self-report measure that focuses on illness worries and attitudes towards illness
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline
Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ)
Self-report measure that focuses on mourning and continuous worrying toughs
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline
Need for Recovery (NRF)
Self-report measure that focuses on time needed on the recovery after work day
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline
Strategy and Attribution Questionnaire (SAQ)
Self-report measure focuses on personal attribute strategies.
Time frame: baseline, 6 and 12 months from the baseline
Self-assessed work ability
Self-assessed work ability (on a scale 0-10) (Tuomi \& al. 1998)
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months from the baseline