The overall aim of this randomized controlled study is to investigate the effectiveness of mirror therapy supported by telerehabilitation on the intensity, duration and frequency of phantom limb pain and daily activities compared to traditional mirror therapy and sensomotor exercises without a mirror in patients following lower limb amputation.
Up to 75% of patients after amputation of an arm or leg suffer from chronic phantom limb pain that still is perceived in the missing limb, leading to limitations in daily activities and quality of life. The treatment of phantom limb pain is still challenging. Despite many different pharmacological interventions, the outcomes on the longer-term are in many cases not satisfying. Alternative, non-pharmacological interventions, such as mirror therapy, are gaining increased recognition in the treatment of phantom limb pain. In this context, telerehabilitation plays an important role to support long-term self-management and autonomy of these patients. In the developmental phase of the project, a user-centred design is applied. Patients as well as physical and occupational therapists are interviewed concerning their preferences and needs with respect to the design and content of the telerehabilitation. Additionally, two focus groups with each five participants will be conducted. Subsequently, a prototype of the telerehabilitation will be developed based on user preferences, available evidence, expert opinion and already existing systems. This prototype will be tested on its usability and technical performance in phase three using the thinking-aloud-method and data logging. Accordingly, a multicenter, randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the telerehabilitation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
105
At least 10 individual sessions over the clinical intervention period of 4 weeks followed by a 6 weeks self-management phase.
Change in average intensity of phantom limb pain
Measurement instrument: 11-point NRS
Time frame: At baseline, 4 and 6 weeks following baseline and at 6 months follow-up
Change in frequency of phantom limb pain
Time frame: At baseline, 4 and 6 weeks following baseline and at 6 months follow-up
Change in duration of phantom limb pain
Time frame: At baseline, 4 and 6 weeks following baseline and at 6 months follow-up
Change in pain related limitations in daily activities
Measurement instrument: PDI, PSFS
Time frame: At baseline, 4 and 6 weeks following baseline and at 6 months follow-up
Change in pain specific self-efficacy
Measurement instrument: Pain specific self-efficacy scale
Time frame: At baseline, 4 and 6 weeks following baseline and at 6 months follow-up
Change in quality of life
Measurement instrument: EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: At baseline, 4 and 6 weeks following baseline and at 6 months follow-up
Change in global perceived effect
Measurement instrument: GPE scale
Time frame: At baseline, 4 and 6 weeks following baseline and at 6 months follow-up
Change in dimensions of phantom limb pain
Measurement instrument: Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)
Time frame: At baseline, 4 and 6 weeks following baseline and at 6 months follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.