The aim of the proposed project is to identify an optimal implementation strategy using a set of evidence-based interventions that aim to increase early detection of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer among African Americans as a model. These three interventions will be packaged and interwoven into a single branded project, Project HEAL (Health through Early Awareness and Learning) which will be delivered through trained Community Health Advisors (CHA) in African-American church settings. The implementation and sustainability will be evaluated using the RE-AIM Framework. Fourteen African American churches in Prince George's County, MD will be randomized to a traditional classroom training approach or an online training approach, in which the CHA training approach and level of technical assistance is varied (in-person classroom training of CHAs + monitoring/evaluation + technical assistance and training vs. online training of CHAs + monitoring and evaluation only, respectively). By varying the training methodology and level of technical assistance, we will be able to determine what level of technical assistance leads to successful implementation and sustainability. We will also identify church organizational capacity characteristics that lead to successful implementation and sustainability. The specific aims of this research are to: (1) Package the three interventions into a single branded project (Project HEAL), develop a local cancer screening resource guide, and pilot test the materials and training. (2) Implement Project HEAL in 14 churches in Prince George's County, Maryland. We will evaluate the implementation outcomes involving treatment fidelity and identify church organizational capacity characteristics that led to successful implementation. We will compare the two implementation strategies (traditional vs. online) to determine the optimal level of technical assistance necessary for successful implementation. (3) Evaluate the sustainability of Project HEAL over a two-year period of time. We will identify church organizational capacity characteristics that led to sustainability, and compare the two implementation strategies (traditional vs. online) to determine the optimal level of technical assistance for successful sustainability.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
457
University of Maryland School of Public Health
College Park, Maryland, United States
Adherence to program delivery protocol - Implementation of the 3-workshop series.
Time frame: Up to 10 months
Number of training events (workshops)
Time frame: Up to 10 months
Number of CHA trainees
Time frame: Baseline
Completion of CHA training
Time frame: Baseline
Self-report of modifications or problems with program delivery
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Number of booster CHA training sessions over two-year period
Time frame: 12-month; 24-month
Change in number of survey completion from baseline to 12-month to 24-month
Time frame: Baseline; 12-month; 24-month
Number of educational sessions participants attended
Time frame: Up to 10 months
Change in knowledge of cancer early detection from workshop 1 to workshop 3
Time frame: Up to 10 months
Change in perceived benefits of screening
Time frame: Up to 10 months
Change in perceived barriers to screening
Time frame: Up to 10 months
Change in self-efficacy for screening
Time frame: Up to 10 months
Change in self-report of screening from baseline to 12-month to 24-month
Time frame: Baseline; 12-month; 24-month
Ratings of program
Time frame: Up to 10 months
Percent of eligible congregation that enrolled in the project
Time frame: Baseline
Number of participants that attended educational sessions
Time frame: Up to 10 months
Enrollment of churches
Number agreed/total approached
Time frame: Baseline
Number of additional training cycles completed over two year period
Time frame: 12-months; 24-months
Amount of supplemental funding church receives for additional health education over two years
Time frame: 12-month; 24-month
Number of continued health education activities including cancer education over two year period
Time frame: 12-month; 24-month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.