The purpose of this study is to determine if a radiation treatment called "Multi-beam Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy"(IMRT) can reduce side effects related to your implant if they are a candidate for radiation therapy. Currently, the standard method of giving radiation is with "3D radiation", which only uses 2-5 beams of radiation. "Multi-beam" IMRT works by using 8-12 small radiation beams to give a more "tailored" or "customized" radiation dose to the implant, breast, chest wall and lymph nodes. At the same time, multi-beam IMRT may lower the radiation dose to the heart, lung and nearby tissues. The goal of the study is to reduce complications after irradiation to the implants. The study doctors have recently completed a trial using this technique and are now specifically looking at its impact on women with implant reconstructions who are undergoing post-mastectomy radiation therapy. By delivering a more "customized" dose of radiation to the implant, the intent is to reduce side effects of radiation on the implant.
Patients will undergo mastectomy and axillary dissection with immediate tissue expander placement. As is the current practice at MSKCC, patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy will undergo expansion during chemotherapy, with exchange for a permanent implant to be performed approximately one month after chemotherapy and radiation to begin approximately one month after exchange. Patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy will undergo "rapid expansion" of the expander and begin radiation at least 4 weeks following surgery, although it may be performed sooner if the patient has recovered from surgery and the treating physician deems it safe to proceed with treatment. In these patients, exchange for the permanent implant will occur at the discretion of the treating plastic surgeon (approximately 5-8 months after the end of radiation).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
The radiation dose (50-50.4 Gy/25-28 fractions in approximately 5-6 weeks), treatment-planning and delivery aspects are according to departmental guidelines for breast IMRT.
Memorial Sloan Kettering at Basking Ridge
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Monmouth
Middletown, New Jersey, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center @ Suffolk
Commack, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Westchester
Harrison, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering at Mercy Medical Center
Rockville Centre, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau (Follow-Up only)
Uniondale, New York, United States
Incidence of Implant Failure
The multi-beam IMRT would be considered efficacious if the incidence of implant failure is reduced by at least a relative 30% by the end of the study period (24 months post-IMRT for Group 1, and 30 months post-IMRT for Group 2).
Time frame: 24 months post-IMRT for Group 1, and 30 months post-IMRT for Group 2
Incidence of Moderate to Severe Capsular Contracture
Will be examined using number of participants who developed Baker's grade \<2 and ≥2 capsular contracture, respectively, at 12 or 18 months and 24 or 30 months after IMRT was administered. Participants were assigned a Baker Classification score (a standardized 4-point scale, which integrates the texture and appearance of the breast) at baseline and each follow-up interval by the radiation oncologist or plastic surgeon (the higher of the 2 was used if the score was discordant). Significant capsular contracture is measured as Baker grade III or IV.
Time frame: 24 months post-IMRT for Group 1, and 30 months post-IMRT for Group 2
Rates of Minor Revisional Surgeries
Incidence of minor revisional surgeries by plastic surgeon will be evaluated by proportions too. Again, the rates (proportions) will be compared across the two groups.
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluate Cosmesis
To evaluate cosmesis, the Breast-Q© will be utilized in these assessments and will be presented descriptively, giving summary statistics for changes in the Breast-Q© scores over time. With a focus on the post-operative period, the module will evaluate changes over time in four of the six subthemes identified by Breast-Q: (1) Psychosocial well-being; (2) Physical well-being; (3) Satisfaction with breasts; and (4) Satisfaction with outcome. Each subtheme will be evaluated using one or more scales. Each scale is independently scored into a value that ranges from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating greater satisfaction or better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up 1 (Arm 1:12 months (± 2 mo); Arm 2:12-18 months (± 6 mo)), Follow-up 2 (Arm 1:12-18 months (± 6 mo); Arm 2:18 months (± 2 mo)), and Follow-up 3 (Arm 1:24 months (± 2 mo); Arm 2:30 months (± 2 mo))
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.