The purpose of this study to determine if a lower hemoglobin transfusion threshold, 7 g/dL, has a safety profile similar to that of the current standard transfusion threshold of 8 g/dL.
Transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) is vitally important for the care of patients undergoing myelosuppressive therapy for acute leukemia. The therapeutic approach to this disease involves the use of high doses of chemotherapy to treat the blood cancers and bone marrow disorders; but it damages the marrow and blood system. Malignant and healthy stem cells are affected by the chemotherapy, and even when the malignant cells are killed, it can take weeks for the healthy cells to reconstitute the marrow. At diagnosis and before bone marrow recovery post treatment, RBCs are needed to support the patient. Current practices at major comprehensive cancer centers all utilize liberal hemoglobin transfusions triggers of 8-9 g/dL or higher. Higher hemoglobin levels in these high risk patients may have benefits such as better energy and organ function. However, research in a variety of clinical settings, suggests that a higher hemoglobin transfusion threshold is associated with the same or even higher mortality rates compared to lower hemoglobin thresholds (7-8 g/dL). These other settings include prospective randomized trials in high-risk orthopedic surgery patients, critically ill adult and pediatric ICU patients, acute GI bleed patients, and patients undergoing cardiac surgery. One clinical scenario where the ideal transfusion threshold is unknown is in patients receiving chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies. Transfusion requirements and triggers have not been systematically studied in acute leukemia or other cancers. Acute leukemia carries a high mortality; any unnecessary increase in morbidity or mortality is not acceptable. Without a clear benefit of higher transfusion thresholds, the added risks and costs of transfusion may be substantial and unnecessary. The investigators plan to study this issue in this pilot and feasibility study by randomly assigning patients treated for acute leukemia to be transfused with RBCs at either a higher or lower hemoglobin concentration trigger point. In this way, the investigators will be able to accurately determine if there is benefit or harms to having a lower or higher red cell count during the induction treatment and recovery period for patients with acute leukemias. This study will also collect information evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the two transfusion thresholds and the feasibility of expanding the study to a large randomized trial.This safety data will serve as a platform for a larger mortality study in leukemia and possibly additional studies in solid tumors.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
90
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Tolerance of low transfusion threshold as assessed by the percentage of participants who crossed over from the low arm to the high arm.
Time frame: 60 days
Safety of low vs. high transfusion threshold as assessed by total difference in number of transfusions given per participant
Overall safety is determined by the total difference between arms for the number of transfusions given per participant
Time frame: 60 days
Safety of low vs. high transfusion threshold as assessed by number of participants experiencing neutropenic infections
Overall safety is determined by the total difference between arms for number of participants experiencing neutropenic infections, where neutropenia is defined as absolute neutrophil count \< 500/mcL.
Time frame: 60 days
Safety of low vs. high transfusion threshold as assessed by number of grade 3-4 bleeding events as defined by CTCAE 4.0
Time frame: 60 days
Safety of low vs. high transfusion threshold as assessed by number of deaths attributed to induction chemotherapy
Time frame: 60 days
Safety of low vs. high transfusion threshold as assessed by number of participants with at least one grade 3-5 non-hematological toxicity by CTCAE 4.0.
Time frame: 60 days
Feasibility as determined by percentage of participants consented
As per protocol-defined criteria, the transfusion strategy being tested would be deemed feasible if all of the following criteria are met: 1) More than 50% of eligible patients could be consented; 2) More than 75% of participants randomized to the low arm tolerated the 7 g/dL transfusion threshold; 3) Fewer than 15% of participants crossed over from the low arm to the high arm; 4) The study was not paused for safety concerns.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 60 days
Feasibility as determined by percentage of participants who tolerate 7g/dL transfusion
As per protocol-defined criteria, the transfusion strategy being tested would be deemed feasible if all of the following criteria are met: 1) More than 50% of eligible patients could be consented; 2) More than 75% of participants randomized to the low arm tolerated the 7 g/dL transfusion threshold; 3) Fewer than 15% of participants crossed over from the low arm to the high arm; 4) The study was not paused for safety concerns.
Time frame: 60 days
Feasibility as determined by percentage of participants who crossed over from the low arm to the high arm
As per protocol-defined criteria, the transfusion strategy being tested would be deemed feasible if all of the following criteria are met: 1) More than 50% of eligible patients could be consented; 2) More than 75% of participants randomized to the low arm tolerated the 7 g/dL transfusion threshold; 3) Fewer than 15% of participants crossed over from the low arm to the high arm; 4) The study was not paused for safety concerns.
Time frame: 60 days
Number of transfusions
Median number of red cell and platelet transfusions given per participant.
Time frame: 60 days
Neutropenic infections
Number of participants in each arm experiencing neutropenic infections, where neutropenia is defined as absolute neutrophil count \< 500/mcL.
Time frame: 60 days
Bleeding
Number of grade 3-4 bleeding events as defined by CTCAE 4.0.
Time frame: 60 days
Length of stay
Median length of inpatient stay in days. This is for the initial inpatient stay for induction chemotherapy only (chemotherapy itself was not part of this protocol).
Time frame: 60 days
Treatment-related mortality
Number of deaths attributed to induction chemotherapy.
Time frame: 60 days
End organ dysfunction
Number of participants with at least one grade 3-5 nonhematological toxicity as defined by CTCAE 4.0.
Time frame: 60 days
Performance status scores
Number of participants with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status \< 2. The ECOG scale is rated from 0 to 5, where 0 is best health and 5 is dead.
Time frame: 60 days
Incidence of crossover
Number of participants who crossed over from the low to the high arm due to symptomatic anemia (defined as Hb \< 8 g/dL with symptoms).
Time frame: 60 days
Cost savings
Estimated per-patient cost savings of the low transfusion threshold compared to the high transfusion threshold.
Time frame: 60 days
Fatigue scores
Median difference in fatigue scores as graded on the National Cancer Institute Fatigue Scale. Scores are from 0 to 10, where 0 is no fatigue and 10 is the worst possible fatigue.
Time frame: 60 days