This clinical investigation is designed to confirm the safety and efficacy of the TD01 ICD lead.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
30
Kepler Universitätsklinikum
Linz, Austria
Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder) GmbH
Frankfurt (Oder), Brandenburg, Germany
Vivantes-Krankenhaus Neukölln
Berlin, Germany
DRK Krankenhaus Chemnitz-Rabenstein
Chemnitz, Germany
TD01 Pacing Threshold
Non-inferiority of the pacing threshold compared to Linox TD. It is expected, that pacing thresholds of the TD01 leads will be statistically significant lower than 0.8V. Pacing threshold is the minimal electrical stimulus (voltage) required to produce consistent cardiac depolarization (heart contraction). Linox TD is another (predecessor) electrode that is used for comparison.
Time frame: 3 month follow-up
TD01 Sensing Amplitude
Non-inferiority of the sensing amplitude compared to Linox TD. It is expected, that the sensing amplitudes of the TD01 leads will be statistically significant higher than 9.7mV. Sensing amplitude is the value for the measured voltage maximum (mV) during the ventricular depolarization (QRS complex during contraction). Linox TD is another (predecessor) electrode that is used for comparison.
Time frame: 3 month follow-up
SADE-free Rate Related to TD01
SADE-free rate related to TD01. It is expected, that the SADE-free rate is higher than 0.9 (90%). SADE Free Rate is a safety parameter and defined as p = 1 - number of SADEs divided by the number of TD01 leads implanted. Whereby Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs) are accounted that relate to the TD01 ICD lead and were observed between implantation until the predefined follow-up time, e.g. the three month follow-up.
Time frame: 3 month follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Kliniken im Naturpark Altmühltal
Kösching, Germany