Lumbar Fusion With The Icotec CF/PEEK Pedicle System In Combination With The Icotec CF/PEEK TLIF Cage ETurn™

N/ACompletedNCT02087267

Sitona AG94 enrolled

Overview

The objective of the PMCF is to collect outcome information on patients suffering from symptomatic degenerative disc disease or degenerative spondylolisthesis requiring 1- or 2-level lumbar or lumbar-sacral spinal fusion with posterior instrumentation and therefore receiving the icotec CF/PEEK Pedicle System in combination with the icotec CF/PEEK TLIF Cage ETurn™.

Background: At present, metal pedicle screw systems made from titanium or stainless steel are commonly used for posterior stabilization. One disadvantage of theses metal devices is that they cause shadows and artifacts on CTs and MRIs which may hamper the postoperative exploration of the onset of spinal diseases and in particular the evaluation of the neuroforamina, the spinal canal and bone-implant interfaces. Therefore new concepts of pedicle screw devices use non-radiopaque materials such as carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) without compromising mechanical properties compared to standard titanium implants and possibly reducing the risk for adjacent segment diseases. Description of the study devices: The icotec Pedicle System is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine. The carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) that is used to produce the icotec pedicle system rod and screw shaft is a thermoplastic composite biomaterial exhibiting properties suitable for load-bearing orthopedic implants. The CF/PEEK material does not cause artifacts or shadows on adjacent tissues with all imaging modalities such as x-ray, CT, and MRI. Radiopaque markers or fibres made from titanium or tantalum are embedded. The pedicle system rod and screws allow this advantage to be realized without compromising mechanical properties compared to standard titanium implants. Description of the study device - icotec CF/PEEK TLIF Cage ETurn: The icotec ETurn™ TLIF cage consists of a windowed body with a central slot, a distraction/ insertion wedge and surface treads on its cranial and caudal surfaces that serve to guide and anchor the implant (see figure 4). The concentrically arranged treads enable the implant to turn on its own from its position of insertion into the disc space to its transverse end position. The tread surfaces help to create a significantly larger pressure-bearing contact surface between the implant and the bone than the conventional pointed anchoring elements. Risk Analysis and risk Management: Most of the risks of implant related, surgical and postoperative complications associated with the implantation of the icotec CF/PEEK Pedicle System in combination with the icotec ETurn™ TLIF cage, are comparable to the risks associated with other TLIF surgeries with cages and pedicle screw systems intended for lumbar spine stabilization. risks and possible adverse outcomes have been identified for the icotec CF/PEEK Pedicle System as well as for the CF/PEEK TLIF Cage ETurn. Legal Aspects: For this post-market investigation only CE-marked medical devices will be used within their intended purpose and no additional invasive or other stressful examinations are to be carried out. All subjects will voluntarily sign the Informed Consent document. Ethics approval for the study will be obtained prior to starting the study Data Monitoring: Independent on-site Monitoring will be performed at all investigational sites.

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

Conditions

Degeneration of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Interventions

1- or 2-level spinal fusionPROCEDURE

1- or 2-level lumbar or lumbar-sacral spinal fusion with the icotec CF/PEEK Pedicle System in combination with the icotec CF/PEEK TLIF Cage ETurn™

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 80 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Symptomatic degenerative disc disease or degenerative spondylolisthesis grade 1 or 2 with chronic low back pain, pain in the leg or buttock, muscle weakness, sensation abnormalities and/or neurogenic claudication * Unsuccessful adequate conservative treatment * 1- or 2- contiguous level lumbar spinal fusion between L2 and S1 with posterior instrumentation in combination with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) * Age between 18 - 80 years at the time of surgery * Skeletally mature patient * Patient understands the conditions of the study and is willing and able to comply with the postoperative scheduled clinical and imaging evaluations and the prescribed rehabilitation * Patient signed Informed Consent Exclusion Criteria: * No adequate non-operative care prior to being treated with a lumbar fusion device * 3-level fusion or more * Fusion not between L2 and S1 * Previous lumbar spinal surgery, other than discectomy at the level(s) to be operated on * Spondylolisthesis acc. to Meyerding grade 3 or higher * Transforaminal access to the disc space is obstructed * Use of bone grafts other than autologous grafts, demineralized bone matrix without additional growth factors and synthetic bone substitute without additional growth factors. Growth factor enhanced grafts, cement or any other graft material are excluded. * Adiposity, severe obesity (BMI \> 35 kg/m2) * Any contraindication for MRI scan including heart pacemaker, metallic foreign body (metal sliver) in the eye or brain, aneurysm clip in the brain, severe claustrophobia etc. * Discitis, spondylodiscitis * Acute or chronic infection, previous surgical site infection or severe defect of the osseous structures * Open wounds * Patient who takes immunosuppressive or long-term steroid use * Fever * Allergy or intolerance to any device material (e.g. Carbon/PEEK, titanium or tantalum) * Foreign body sensitivity * Insufficient form fit between the implant and the bone owing to deformation or destruction of the pedicles or of the vertebral body end plates * Risk that the intervertebral device can subside into the vertebral bodies * Bone tumors in the region of the implant anchoring * Severe osteoporosis or similar bone density loss, incl. any metabolic bone disease * Cases, in which the progression of degenerative disease is so advanced at the time of implantation that it may substantially decrease the expected useful life of the appliance * Systemic or metabolic illnesses (i.e. insulin-dependent diabetes) * Patient who is suffering from rheumatological or other inflammatory joint disease * Paralysis of lower extremity * Generally poor condition of the patient * Psychosocial issues; lack of co-operation by the patient * Drug abuse or alcoholism * Any medical or surgical condition that could preclude the potential success of the implantation * Any condition not described in the indications for use * Unwillingness or inability of the patient to follow the instructions for postoperative treatment or with the follow-up evaluation schedule * Female patient who is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study * Prisoner * Patient who has not signed the Informed Consent

Locations (6)

Universitätsklinikum SH Klinik für Neurochirurgie

Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Friedrichsheim gGmbH

Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Städtisches Klinikum Görlitz gGmbH, Klinik für Neurochirurgie

Görlitz, Germany

DIAKOVERE Annastift - Orthopädische Klinik der MHH

Hanover, Germany

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Overall fusion rate

Outcome Measure by CT/MRI and clinical follow-up

Time frame: 2 years postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes

Rate of pedicle system implant failures

Outcome Measure by CT/MRI and clinical follow-up

Time frame: 2 years postoperatively

Rate of implant related, surgery related, postoperative and general complications

Outcome Measure by CT/MRI and clinical follow-up

Time frame: 2 years postoperatively

Rate of subsequent surgical interventions

Outcome Measure by CT/MRI and clinical follow-up

Time frame: 2 years postoperatively

Change of the mean total Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI)

clinical follow-up

Time frame: Change from the preoperative baseline to the 2 year postoperative assessment

Change of the mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on low back pain

clinical follow-up

Time frame: Change from the preoperative baseline to the 2 year postoperative assessment

Change of the mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on pain in the leg and buttock (experienced in the pain-dominant leg)

clinical follow-up

Time frame: Change from the preoperative baseline to the 2 year postoperative assessment

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on patient's satisfaction with the surgery

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.