This study is being done to analyze the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of treatment for advanced melanoma (MEL) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using combination regimens of pembrolizumab + pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PegIFN-2b) and pembrolizumab + ipilimumab (IPI). The primary hypothesis is that these combinations will be sufficiently well-tolerated to permit continued clinical investigation.
The trial is being done in three parts: Part 1A (MEL and RCC) will define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/maximum administered dose (MAD) for the drug combinations; a recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for each combination will be identified. Part 1B (MEL-single arm expansion) will better characterize safety and efficacy and provide preliminary efficacy data for the pembrolizumab + IPI combination in participants with MEL. Part 1C (MEL) is added as the third part of the study with Amendment 3. Part 1C will evaluate safety and efficacy for different doses and dosing intervals for IPI in combination with pembrolizumab in participants with advanced MEL. In the pembrolizumab + IPI study arms, qualified participants who receive the first course but experience disease progression after discontinuing pembrolizumab with stable disease or better, may, at the investigator's discretion, initiate a second course of pembrolizumab at the same dose and schedule for up to 17 doses (up to \~1 additional year) + IPI at the same dose and schedule for up to 4 doses (up to \~12 additional weeks). In the pembrolizumab + PEG-IFN study arms, qualified participants who receive the first course but experience disease progression after discontinuing pembrolizumab with stable disease or better may, at the investigator's discretion, initiate a second course of pembrolizumab at the same dose and schedule for up to 17 doses (up to \~1 additional year). Per protocol, response or progression during the second course will not count towards efficacy outcome measure and adverse events during the second course will not count towards safety outcome measures. Part 2 (MEL and RCC) is a randomized portion of the trial and will evaluate preliminary efficacy of the drug combinations for advanced MEL participants. Part 2 was removed from the study with Amendment 3 of the protocol.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
295
IV infusion
Subcutaneous infusion
IV infusion
Percentage of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) (Part 1A)
Participants in Part 1A were analyzed for DLTs. DLTs included all adverse experiences that were clearly not related to disease progression or intercurrent illness if judged by the investigator to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to study intervention. Reported adverse experiences used the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. DLTs were analyzed and reported separately for protocol specified clinical indications of metastatic melanoma (MEL) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Part 1A: Part 1A Pembrolizumab + IPI 1mg/kg (MEL), Part 1A Pembrolizumab + IPI 1 mg/kg (RCC), Part 1A Pembrolizumab + PEG-IFN 1 µg/kg (MEL), Part 1A Pembrolizumab + PEG-IFN 1 µg/kg (RCC), Part 1A Pembrolizumab + PEG-IFN 2 µg/kg (RCC). Per protocol, DLT outcome analysis did not include Parts 1B and 1C.
Time frame: Up to ~6 Weeks
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product was also an AE. Reported adverse experiences used the Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0.The number of participants who experienced at least one AE was reported.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to AEs
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product was also an AE. Reported adverse experiences used the CTCAE Version 4.0. The percentage of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE was reported.
Time frame: Up to ~24 months
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events of Special Interest (AEOSIs) (Parts 1B and 1C)
AEOSIs consist of immune-mediated events, infusion reactions and depression. Events include Pneumonitis, Colitis, Hepatitis, Nephritis, Adrenal Insufficiency, Hypophysitis, Hyperthyroidism, Hypothyroidism, Thyroiditis, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Skin Disorders, Uveitis, Pancreatitis, Myositis, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Myocarditis, Encephalitis, Sarcoidosis, Infusion Reactions, Myasthenic Syndrome, Myelitis, Vasculitis, and Cholangitis Sclerosing. Per protocol Part 1B and Part 1C are reported. Part 1A was not included in the AEOIs outcome analysis, per protocol.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3-5 Drug-related AEs (Part 1C)
Participants in Part 1C who experienced grade 3-5 drug-related AEs (DRAEs) using CTCAE Version 4.0 are presented. Grade 3-5 DRAEs for Parts 1A and 1B was a secondary outcome analysis, per protocol and reported later in the record.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) (Part 1C)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) as assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. The percentage of participants who experienced a CR or PR is presented. Per protocol, ORR in Part 1C was planned and conducted as a pre-specified primary outcome analysis. ORR in Part 1B was planned and conducted as a protocol-specified secondary outcome analysis and has been reported later in the record. Outcome analysis of ORR in Part 1A was not planned or conducted in this study, per protocol.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Part 2)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. PFS was to be assessed by independent central review per RECIST 1.1. Part 2 of the study was not conducted, based on protocol specified criteria and this Part 2 specific outcome measure could not be reported.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) (Part 1B)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a CR: Disappearance of all target lesions or a PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions as assessed using RECIST 1.1. The percentage of participants who experienced a CR or PR is presented. Per protocol, ORR in Part 1B was planned and conducted as a pre-specified secondary outcome analysis. ORR in Part 1C was planned and conducted as a protocol-specified primary outcome analysis and has been reported earlier in the record. Outcome analysis of ORR in Part 1A was not planned or conducted in this study, per protocol.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
ORR by Programmed-death Receptor-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Status Using RECIST 1.1 (Parts 1B and 1C)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a CR: Disappearance of all target lesions or a PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions as assessed using RECIST 1.1. The percentage of participants that experienced a CR or PR by PD-L1 status is presented. PD-L1 positivity was defined as ≥1% staining in tumor and inflammatory cells, while PD-L1 negativity is defined as \<1% staining. ORR for participants in Parts 1B and 1C with measurable disease at baseline based on central independent review, who had ORR data available for PD-L1+ and PD-L1- participants are presented. Outcome analysis of ORR in Part 1A was not planned or conducted in this study, per protocol.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
Percentage of Participants With an Ordinal Response, Estimated by a Best Overall Response of VGPR or MPR (Parts 1B and 1C)
Ordinal response, per RECIST 1.1 included the best overall responses of Very Good Partial Response (\[VGPR\]\>60% tumor reduction) as well as Moderate Partial Response (\[MPR\]\>30%- ≤60% tumor reduction). The percentage of participants in Part 1B and 1C who experienced a MPR or VGPR (based on the degree of tumor shrinkage) in participants with advanced melanoma is presented. Outcome analysis of ordinal response in Part 1A was not planned or conducted in this study, per protocol.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
Duration of Response (DOR) (Parts 1B and 1C)
DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of a CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) or death. DOR for participants who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was to be censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions as well as an absolute increase of at least a 5 mm in the sum of diameters. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. DOR assessments were based on central imaging review with confirmation. The DOR as assessed using RECIST 1.1 for participants with measurable disease at baseline based on central independent review in Parts 1B and 1C who experienced a confirmed CR or PR with DOR data available is presented. Outcome analysis of DOR in Part 1A was not planned or conducted in this study, per protocol.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Parts 1B and 1C)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. PFS as assessed by independent central review per RECIST 1.1 for all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment in Part 1B and all randomized participants in Part 1C, who had PFS data available is presented. Outcome analysis of PFS in Part 1A was not planned or conducted in this study, per protocol.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
Overall Survival (OS) (Parts 1B and 1C)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. OS for all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment in Part 1B and all randomized participants in Part 1C, who had OS data available is presented. Outcome analysis of OS in Part 1A was not planned or conducted in this study, per protocol.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
PFS by PD-L1 Status Using RECIST 1.1 (Parts 1B and 1C)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. PD-L1 positivity was defined as ≥1% staining in tumor and inflammatory cells, while PD-L1 negativity is defined as \<1% staining. PFS for all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment in Part 1B and all randomized participants in Part 1C, who had PFS data available for PD-L1+ and PD-L1- participants is presented. Outcome analysis of PFS in Part 1A was not planned or conducted in this study, per protocol.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
OS by PD-L1 Status Using RECIST 1.1 (Parts 1B and 1C)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. PD-L1 positivity was defined as ≥1% staining in tumor and inflammatory cells, while PD-L1 negativity is defined as \<1% staining. OS for all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment in Part 1B and all randomized participants in Part 1C, who had OS data available for PD-L1+ and PD-L1- participants is presented. Outcome analysis of OS in Part 1A was not planned or conducted in this study, per protocol.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3-5 DRAEs (Parts 1A and 1B)
Participants in Parts 1A and 1B who experienced DRAEs using CTCAE Version 4.0 are presented. Grade 3-5 DRAEs for Part 1C was a primary outcome analysis, per protocol and reported earlier in the record.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months
ORR (Part 2)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) as assessed using RECIST 1.1. Part 2 of the study was not conducted, based on protocol specified criteria and this Part 2 specific outcome measure was not reported.
Time frame: Up to ~84 months