This study will assess the long-term safety and efficacy of repeat treatment courses of rituximab, in combination with methotrexate in a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) inadequate responder population of participants who were previously randomized into studies WA16291 (NCT02693210) or WA17043/U2644g (NCT00074438). The study permits multiple re-treatments until the protocol-defined end-of-treatment date (31 December 2011). Participants will then enter a safety follow-up (SFU) period of at least 48 weeks. This will provide at least 7 years follow-up data on all participants initially randomized into WA16291 or WA17043/U2644g. Approximately 600 participants will potentially be eligible to enter this open label extension study from their respective feeder studies.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
465
Participants will receive rituximab 1 gram IV on Days 1 and 15 of each course of retreatment.
Participants will receive methotrexate 10-25 mg/week orally or parenterally.
Participants will receive methylprednisolone 100 mg IV 30 minutes prior to each rituximab infusion.
Participants will receive folic acid \>= 5 mg/week or equivalent.
Unnamed facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unnamed facility
Peoria, Arizona, United States
Unnamed facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unnamed facility
La Jolla, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Long Beach, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response After First Course
A participant had an ACR20 response if there was at least a 20 percent (%) improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[visual analog scale (VAS): 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (either C-reactive protein \[CRP\] or erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR\]). The ACR20 response was compared to Baseline in the precursor studies WA16291 or WA17043.
Time frame: 24 weeks after first course of rituximab (up to approximately 26 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With ACR20 Response After Second Course
A participant had an ACR20 response if there was at least a 20% improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in TJC and SJC (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (either CRP or ESR). The ACR20 response was compared to Baseline in the precursor studies WA16291 or WA17043.
Time frame: 24 weeks after second course of rituximab (median duration of 90.9 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With ACR20 Response After Third Course
A participant had an ACR20 response if there was at least a 20% improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in TJC and SJC (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (either CRP or ESR). The ACR20 response was compared to Baseline in the precursor studies WA16291 or WA17043.
Time frame: 24 weeks after third course of rituximab (median duration of 162.9 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With ACR20 Response After Fourth Course
A participant had an ACR20 response if there was at least a 20% improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in TJC and SJC (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (either CRP or ESR). The ACR20 response was compared to Baseline in the precursor studies WA16291 or WA17043.
Time frame: 24 weeks after fourth course of rituximab (median duration of 232 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With ACR20 Response After Fifth Course
A participant had an ACR20 response if there was at least a 20% improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in TJC and SJC (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (either CRP or ESR). The ACR20 response was compared to Baseline in the precursor studies WA16291 or WA17043.
Time frame: 24 weeks after fifth course of rituximab (median duration of 297.3 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With ACR20 Response After Sixth Course
A participant had an ACR20 response if there was at least a 20% improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in TJC and SJC (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (either CRP or ESR). The ACR20 response was compared to Baseline in the precursor studies WA16291 or WA17043.
Time frame: 24 weeks after sixth course of rituximab (median duration of 354.4 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With ACR20 Response After Seventh Course
A participant had an ACR20 response if there was at least a 20% improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in TJC and SJC (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (either CRP or ESR). The ACR20 response was compared to Baseline in the precursor studies WA16291 or WA17043.
Time frame: 24 weeks after seventh course of rituximab (median duration of 406.7 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With ACR50 and ACR70 Response
A participant had an ACR50 and ACR70 response if there was at least a 50% or 70% improvement, ie, reduction from Baseline, in TJC and SJC (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity \[VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain \[VAS: 0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain\]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire \[20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do\] and 5) an acute-phase reactant (CRP or ESR). The ACR50 and ACR70 responses were compared to Baseline in the precursor studies WA16291 or WA17043.
Time frame: 24 weeks after first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh course of rituximab (median duration of 26, 90.9, 162.9, 232, 297.3, 354.4, and 406.7 weeks, respectively)
American College of Rheumatology Index of Improvement (ACRn) Response
The ACRn is calculated for each participant by taking the lowest percentage improvement in (1) SJC or (2) TJC or (3) the median of the remaining 5 components of the ACR response (patient's assessment of disease activity; patient's global assessment of pain; physician's assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function; an acute phase reactant value \[either CRP or ESR\]). The index of improvement in RA, where 0 indicates no improvement and 100 indicates a 100% improvement across all signs and symptoms of RA. ACRn scores were calculated considering the original baseline in the precursor studies WA16291 or WA17043.
Time frame: 24 weeks after first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh course of rituximab (median duration of 26, 90.9, 162.9, 232, 297.3, 354.4, and 406.7 weeks, respectively)
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity and Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-ESR
DAS28-ESR was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity). DAS28-ESR = 0.56\*square root (sqrt)(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-ESR \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity (LDA) and DAS28-ESR \<2.6 = clinical remission.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Rancho Mirage, California, United States
Unnamed facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Unnamed facility
Aventura, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
...and 82 more locations
Time frame: 24 weeks after first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh course of rituximab (median duration of 26, 90.9, 162.9, 232, 297.3, 354.4, and 406.7 weeks, respectively)
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response of 'Good' or 'Moderate'
DAS28-ESR was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity). DAS28-ESR = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*ln(ESR) + 0.014\*Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders had a change from baseline greater than (\>) 1.2 with a DAS28 score less than or equal to (≤) 3.2; moderate responders had a change from baseline \>1.2 with a DAS28 score \>3.2 to less than or equal to (≤) 5.1 or a change from baseline \>0.6 to ≤1.2 with a DAS28 score ≤5.1.
Time frame: 24 weeks after first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh course of rituximab (median duration of 26, 90.9, 162.9, 232, 297.3, 354.4, and 406.7 weeks, respectively)
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at 24 Weeks Following Each Course
The HAQ-DI is a questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis and consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: Dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Participants completed the questionnaire by answering the 20 questions on a scale of 0 (without difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). A negative change score indicates improvement.
Time frame: 24 weeks after first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh course of rituximab (median duration of 26, 90.9, 162.9, 232, 297.3, 354.4, and 406.7 weeks, respectively)
Change From Baseline in Total Rheumatoid Factors (RF) at 24 Weeks Following Each Course
Time frame: 24 weeks after first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh course of rituximab (median duration of 26, 90.9, 162.9, 232, 297.3, 354.4, and 406.7 weeks, respectively)
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Insufficient Response
Time frame: First, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh course of rituximab (up to a median of approximately 2, 62, 124, 186, 248, 310, and 372 weeks, respectively)
Time Since Last Treatment Course
Time since last treatment course = The last day of the last dose of rituximab to date of last contact. Date of last contact is the last available date of efficacy, complete medication start date, laboratory, adverse event assessments, early withdrawal visit, date of last contact, or date of death.
Time frame: Baseline up to 10 years