This randomized clinical trial studies narrative or fact-based videos in increasing colorectal cancer screenings in African American communities. Informational videotapes may help increase the number of participants who engage in colonoscopy screenings. It is not yet known whether narrative videos may be more effective than fact-based videos in increasing colorectal cancer screenings.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Assess both individual and environmental factors that guide decisions and behaviors to engage or not engage in colonoscopy screenings for African Americans in the two communities. II. Using a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach, develop and pilot a peer-led, narrative-based colorectal cancer behavioral intervention for increasing colonoscopy screening behaviors in African Americans. III. Examine the efficacy of a narrative communication-style group intervention compared to a didactic intervention to influence African Americans' engagement in colorectal cancer screening, including examining the degree to which the community interventions impact cognitive and affective decision making factors about health care seeking. IV. Examine and explore contextual factors that may influence the process of behavior change to better understand colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and health care seeking behaviors. OUTLINE: Program locations are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Participants view videos with information about CRC and screening delivered by personal narrative. ARM II: Participants view videos with information about CRC and screening delivered by informative fact-based message. After completion of study, patients are followed up at 3 and 6 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,310
View personal narrative informational video
View fact-based informational video
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, United States
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, United States
Change in likelihood of CRC screening in previously unscreened subjects
A change score (post-presentation minus pre-presentation) will be created and summarized. In addition, the change score will be further dichotomized (e.g. increase versus no increase in the likelihood of screening) and the percent of those who experienced an increased likelihood, denoted by pi, will be computed. A corresponding 95% confidence interval will be calculated. To test for differences in variables collected pre- and post-presentation, generalized mixed linear models will be used. Testing will be done at the 0.0.5 nominal significance level and using the approximate t-test method.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-presentation
Number of negative affective responses to CRC screening per Affective Associations and Affectively-Based Risk surveys
A linear mixed model (LMM) will be employed and implemented in the SAS program MIXED.
Time frame: Post-presentation up to 6 months
Number of positive cognitive responses to CRC screening per Cognitively-Based Perceived Risk survey
An LMM will be employed and implemented in the SAS program MIXED.
Time frame: Post-presentation up to 6 months
Number of participants who had or scheduled colonoscopy
A generalized linear model with a logit link function will be used.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Number of participants who performed the fecal occult blood test (FOBT)/fecal immunohistochemistry test (FIT)
A generalized linear model with a logit link function will be used.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Number of participants who discussed CRC screening with their primary care physician
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
A generalized linear model with a logit link function will be used.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Influential factors in behavior changes, assessed using qualitative analyses of text from participant interviews, including affective associations with the program, participants' cognitive-affective influences, and predisposing influences
Qualitative text from a text analysis program will be funneled into categories using the PEN-3 and analyzed according to the categories' role and influence. Findings will be examined in comparison to quantitative data regarding the content of the intervention.
Time frame: Baseline to 1 week post-presentation & 6-months
Influential factors in behavior changes, assessed using qualitative analyses of text from participant interviews, including affective associations with the program, participants' cognitive-affective influences, and predisposing influences
Qualitative text from a text analysis program will be funneled into categories using the PEN-3 and analyzed according to the categories' role and influence. Findings will be examined in comparison to quantitative data regarding the content of the intervention.
Time frame: 1 week post-presentation to 6 months