The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of multiple doses of Dysport used in the treatment of upper limb spasticity (altered skeletal muscle performance) in children with cerebral palsy (CP).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
212
Subjects randomised to receive Dysport 2 U/kg, 8 U/kg or 16 U/kg administered intramuscularly in the study limb.
Unnamed facility
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Unnamed facility
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Mean Change From Baseline to TC 1, Week 6 in MAS Score in the TC 1 PTMG
The MAS was used to assess muscle tone in the upper limb PTMG and consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM) when the affected part is moved in flexion or extension, 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension). The original score '+1' was given a derived numeric score of '2' and the higher numeric scores were incremented by 1 so that the MAS score range was from 0 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater muscle tone. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in muscle tone.
Time frame: Baseline (TC 1, Day 1) and TC 1, Week 6.
Mean Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score at TC 1, Week 6
The PGA of treatment response was assessed by asking the investigator the following question: 'How would you rate the response to treatment in the subject's upper limb since the start of the study?'. Answers were on a 9-point rating scale (-4: markedly worse, -3: much worse, -2: worse, -1: slightly worse, 0: no change, +1: slightly improved, +2: improved, +3: much improved and +4: markedly improved). The mean scores for each treatment group at TC 1, Week 6 are presented.
Time frame: TC 1, Week 6.
Mean Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) Total Score at TC 1, Week 6
The GAS is a functional 5-point scale used to measure progress towards individual therapy goals. At start of each TC, 1 to 3 individual goals were defined for each subject by investigator and child's parents/guardians/caregivers prior to treatment. Outcome to reach each goal was rated on a 5-point scale ranging from -2 to +2 (-2: much less than expected outcome, -1: somewhat less than expected outcome, 0: expected outcome, +1: somewhat more than expected outcome, +2: much more than expected outcome). Higher score indicates a better outcome. A GAS T-score was calculated as: 50+(10∑\_(i=1)\^n wi xi)/√(0.7∑\_(i=1)\^n wi\^2 +0.3(∑\_(i=1)\^n wi)\^2) where, xi = rating of ith goal post-baseline; wi = weight of ith goal, calculated as importance \* difficulty as defined at baseline; n = number of goals assessed at baseline and post-baseline. A GAS T-score of 50 indicates goals achieved as expected. Scores below 50 reflect under attainment of goals and scores above 50 reflect over attainment of goals.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Unnamed facility
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Unnamed facility
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Unnamed facility
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Unnamed facility
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Unnamed facility
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Unnamed facility
New York, New York, United States
Unnamed facility
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Unnamed facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
...and 21 more locations
Time frame: TC 1, Week 6.