1. Purpose \- The investigators aim to evaluate the feasibility of iPhone based remote control system as a real-time remote CT reading tool for suspected appendicitis under 3G network and the suboptimal illumination. 2. Methods * A total of 120 abdominal CT examinations; sixty had no findings of appendicitis, while the other sixty showed signs of acute appendicitis, were selected. The 16 raters reviewed these images using an LCD monitor of the PACS workstation and also an iPhone which was connected to the PACS workstation via remote control system, grading the probability of presence of acute appendicitis on each examination by a five Likert scale. * The investigators will compare the diagnostic performance between two devices.
The 16 raters were randomly divided into two groups * The raters in group one reviewed the CT examinations numbered from one to 60 using LCD monitor and reviewed the remaining CT examinations numbered from 61 to 120 using iPhone with TeamViewer at their first visit * The other group firstly reviewed the CT scans numbered from one to 60 using iPhone with TeamViewer and 61 to 120 with the LCD monitor. * They visited twice with an interval of four weeks and reviewed the CT scans using revered devices at each session. * The raters were instructed to rate the likelihood of the presence or absence of appendicitis in each case using a five-Likert scale (1 = obvious no appendicitis, 2 = unlikely appendicitis, 3 = unsure, 4 = likely appendicitis, 5 = obvious appendicitis).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
16
Hanyang university guri hospital, Department of emergency medicine
Guri-si, GyeongGido, South Korea
Diagnostic performance between iPhone and LCD monitor
* Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method with RSCORE and semi-parametric estimation of ROC indices by using the DMB-MRMC software (version 2.3, available at http://perception.radiology.uiowa.edu) * 95% confidence interval * The reviewers and cases are taken as random factors
Time frame: within one day
Diagnostic accuracy between the iPhone and the LCD monitor
◆ Sensitivity, specificity * gold standard: The pathology report and the results of clinical follow up * grade 1, 2 and 3 = negative appendicitis findings * grade 4 and 5 = positive appendicitis findings * McNemar's test to compare the sensitivity and specificity between the iPhad and the LCD monitor
Time frame: within one day
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.