The primary objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of two dose regimens of recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF) eye drops solution administered over 6 months versus a vehicle control in patients with typical retinitis pigmentosa. The secondary objective of this study is to attempt to show a dose response by assessing the potential efficacy of the rhNGF dose regimens for improving or slowing the deterioration of visual function outcomes at 3 and 6 months. During a 6 month follow-up period patients will be monitored to determine if there is evidence of a persistent biological effect after discontinuation of the study treatment.
This is a 24-week phase Ib/II, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, vehicle controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging study with a 24-week follow-up period to evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of two doses (60 μg/ml and 180 μg/ml) of recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF) eye drops solution versus vehicle in patients with typical retinitis pigmentosa (RP).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
50
rhNGF 60 µg/ml eye drops solution, one drop 3 times a day for 24 weeks in both eyes
rhNGF 180 µg/ml eye drops solution, one drop 3 times a day for 24 weeks in both eyes
Placebo eye drops solution, one drop 3 times a day for 24 weeks in both eyes
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi
Florence, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo - U.O. Oculistica
Milan, Italy
A.O. Seconda Università Degli Studi di Napoli - Nuovo Policlinico - UOC Oftalmologia
Naples, Italy
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Policlinico Gemelli - Istituto di Oftalmologia
Rome, Italy
IRCCS Fondazione G.B. Bietti per lo Studio e la Ricerca in Oftalmologia
Rome, Italy
Number of Participants With Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events
Twenty-seven patients of the Safety population experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event, 11 patients in the rhNGF 60 μg/ml arm, 13 patients in the rhNGF 180 μg/ml arm and 3 patients in the vehicle arm.
Time frame: up to 48 weeks
Change in Ocular Tolerability - VAS
A global ocular discomfort score was determined using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on which 0 means no symptoms and 100 means the worst possible discomfort. Specific ocular symptoms to be assessed with the VAS included: foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision, photophobia. For ocular tolerability analysis, mixed models for repeated measures were applied using various ocular tolerability parameters as response variable, treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value as covariate.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24
Change in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) (ETDRS Chart)
Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) was assessed for each eye at each visit using an ETDRS visual acuity chart at 4 meters.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Intraocular Pressure was measured using either Goldmann applanation tonometry or a handheld applanation tonometer (e.g. Tonopen) after the instillation of a topical anesthetic.IOP was assessed for each eye at day 0 and at week 2, 12 and 24
Time frame: Weeks 2,12 and 24
Number of Participants With Normal or Abnormal Findings by Slit Lamp Examination
Slit Lamp Examination (SLE) (Biomicroscopy) was performed before the instillation of any dilating or anesthetic eye drops or fluorescein agents. SLE was executed to assess eyelids, lashes, conjunctiva, cornea, lens, iris and anterior chamber.
Time frame: Day 0; Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48
External Ocular Examination
External ocular examinations were done to assess, for each eye and at each visit, the motility of extraocular muscles, appearance and function of the eyelids.
Time frame: Day 0, Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24
Change in Ocular Tolerability - Dilated Fundus Ophthalmoscopy
Dilated fundus ophthalmoscopy was assessed for each eye evaluating the retina, macula, choroid and optic nerve head.
Time frame: Day 0, Weeks 12, 24 and 48
Presence of Anti-NGF Antibodies
Anti-NGF antibodies tests were performed at screening and at the end of treatment
Time frame: At Day 0 and at week 24
Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity
Contrast sensitivity was assessed using a Mars chart and is expressed as a log contrast sensitivity (log CS) score given by the log CS value at the lowest contrast numeral just prior to two incorrectly identified numerals, minus a scoring correction. The higher is the number of characters properly read by the patient, the higher is the contrast sensitivity.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Change From Baseline in Humphrey Visual Field 24-2
The Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) analyzer is a tool for measuring the human visual field by providing information regarding the location of any disease processes or lesion(s) throughout the visual pathway. In particular, Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 was used to assess static perimetry by measuring 24 degrees temporally and 30 degrees nasally and tests 54 points. The Analyser projects a series of white light stimuli of varying intensities (brightness), throughout a uniformly illuminated bowl. The higher is the number of stimuli perceived by the patient, the better is the retina's ability to detect a stimulus at specific points within the visual field.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Change in Goldmann Visual Field
The Goldmann field exam was performed to assess kinetic perimetry on all enrolled patients.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Fundus Imaging
A recordable fundus image (photo or other electronic format) showing the central 30 degrees was captured through a dilated pupil to document the appearance of the posterior pole.
Time frame: Day 0, Weeks 24 and 48
Ocular Coherence Tomography (OCT)
Ocular coherence tomography was performed to evaluate the cross-sectional anatomy of the macula and to document areas of retinal atrophy.
Time frame: Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Microperimetry
MP1 microperimetry was analyzed to provide a more accurate measurement of retinal sensitivity in the central visual field, even in patients with unstable or extrafoveal fixation.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Binocular Estermann Visual Field
Binocular visual field with Estermann grid testing a stimulus array of 120 points spread over an area extending approximately ±75° horizontally, 35° superiorly and 55° inferiorly while the patient looked steadily at the fixation target.
Time frame: Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Electrorethinogram (ERG)
A full field and 30 Hz flicker ERG was performed according to international standards. Patients were treated with anesthetic and dilating drops prior to the ERG procedure.
Time frame: Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48