Early identification of acute HCV infection is essential to prevent chronic infections and the long-term liver disease complications that may occur. Early identification and treatment of HCV during the acute phase can result in significantly higher response rates with shorter durations of therapy. Pegylated-interferon alfa (PEG-IFN) was the typical treatment for HCV infection. Participants subcutaneously inject PEG-IFN where the average duration of treatment was approximately 20 weeks. With the advancement of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), it was possible to see if a new DAA might be non-inferior compared to (PEG-IFN). The study was designed to see if a fixed-dose combination tablet can replace the old HCV treatments by being more effective, safer and better tolerated in HIV-infected participants with new HCV infection. The study was a Phase I, open-label, two cohort clinical trial, in which 44 acutely HCV-infected HIV-1 positive participants were enrolled. Participants in each cohort were evaluated in two steps: on treatment (Step 1) and follow-up after discontinuing study treatment (Step 2). The cohorts were enrolled sequentially. Participants in Cohort 1 were enrolled and administered oral Sofosbuvir (SOF) in combination with weight-based ribavirin (RBV). Participants in Cohort 2 were enrolled and administered an oral fixed dose combination of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF).
The first cohort opened with SOF/RBV treatment for 12 weeks and accrued 17 participants. All participants under Cohort 1 were to visit the clinical site at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 when on treatment (Step 1), then visit the clinical site again at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks during follow-up after discontinuing study treatment (Step 2). The second cohort opened for an 8-week treatment of LDV/SOF and included at least 27 subjects. All participants under Cohort 2 were to visit the clinical site at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 when on treatment (Step 1), then visit the clinical site again at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks during follow-up after discontinuing study treatment (Step 2). Both cohorts were monitored for safety and HCV viral load response while the participants were on treatment. The primary objective did not compare the cohorts together; instead, each study cohort was formally assessed for efficacy with sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment based on non-inferiority criteria compared to a historical SVR rate of 60% separately.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
44
Participants received one 400 mg tablet of sofosbuvir (SOF) orally every morning with food
Participants received weight-based ribavirin RBV orally, 2 times a day, every morning and every evening, with food. Weight under 75 kg, 600 mg (3 tablets) morning and 400 mg (2 tablets) evening. Weight over 75 kg, 600 mg (3 tablets) morning and 600 mg (3 tablets) evening. The dose of RBV was based on subject's weight at entry. Changes in weight after entry did not require a change in dose. Doses were only changed for toxicity management.
Participants received one daily fixed-dose combination tablet orally every morning of 90 mg of Ledipasvir (LDV) and 400 mg of SOF.
701 University of California, San Diego AntiViral Research Center CRS
San Diego, California, United States
801 University of California, San Francisco HIV/AIDS CRS
San Francisco, California, United States
Whitman Walker Health CRS (31791)
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
2701 Northwestern University CRS
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Rush Univ. Med. Ctr. ACTG CRS (2702)
Chicago, Illinois, United States
101 Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) CRS
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
7804 Weill Cornell Chelsea CRS
New York, New York, United States
7803 Weill Cornell Upton CRS
New York, New York, United States
2401 Cincinnati CRS
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
6201 Penn Therapeutics CRS
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
...and 2 more locations
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 (SVR12)
SVR12 was defined as HCV RNA undetectable less than the lower limit of quantification, Target Not Detected (\<LLOQ TND) of the assay at 12 weeks after date of last dose of study treatment. For both Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, the 12 week measurement used for determining SVR12 was the measurement obtained closest to 84 days (i.e. 12\*7 days), within the window 79 to 112 days inclusive. If a participant did not have an HCV RNA measurement within this window, then the participant was considered as having detectable HCV RNA at 12 weeks unless the preceding and subsequent HCV RNA measurements were both undetectable (\<LLOQ TND). A two-sided 90% confidence interval was calculated for this percentage using the Blyth-Still-Casella method.
Time frame: At 12 weeks after date of last dose of study treatment. The duration of study treatment for Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 were 12 and 8 weeks, respectively.
Percentage of Participants With an Occurrence of a Grade ≥ 2 Adverse Event, Serious AE According to ICH Criteria, or Treatment-limiting AE.
Any adverse event occurring after initiation of study treatment through to 28 days after the date of last dose of study treatment was included (except that an event that was ongoing at the same grade from before start of study treatment was excluded). Adverse events consisted of Grade ≥ 2 primary diagnosis, primary sign/symptoms, and primary laboratory abnormality. It also included any serious adverse event according to ICH criteria and any treatment-limiting AE (ie, an AE reported as the reason for permanent discontinuation of study treatment). A two-sided 90% confidence interval was calculated for the percentage using the Blyth-Still-Casella method.
Time frame: From initiation of study treatment to 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The duration for study treatment for Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 were 12 and 8 weeks, respectively.
Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA Undetectable During Study Treatment
HCV RNA undetectable was defined as an HCV RNA measurement \<LLOQ, TND. If there was no measurement at a scheduled time, then the participant was considered as having detectable HCV RNA at that time, unless both the preceding and succeeding measurements were undetectable. A two-sided 90% confidence interval was calculated for each proportion using the Blyth-Still-Casella method.
Time frame: 1, 2, 4, 8 and, for the 12-week regimen, 12 weeks after starting study treatment.
Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA Undetectable After End of Study Treatment
HCV RNA undetectable is defined as an HCV RNA measurement \<LLOQ, TND. If there was no measurement at a scheduled time, then the participant was considered as having detectable HCV RNA at that time, unless both the preceding and succeeding measurements were undetectable. This outcome measure was referred to as SVR2, SVR4, SVR8 and SVR24 where SVR means sustained virologic response. A two-sided 90% confidence interval was calculated for the percentage using the Blyth-Still-Casella method.
Time frame: 2, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after last dose of study treatment. The duration of study treatment for Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 were 12 and 8 weeks, respectively.
Number of Participants Who Had HCV Virologic Relapse
HCV virologic relapse was defined as HCV RNA undetectable at end-of-treatment but HCV RNA quantifiable during follow-up with subsequent confirmation as quantifiable.
Time frame: From end of study treatment through to 24 weeks after end of study treatment. The duration of study treatment for Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 were 12 and 8 weeks, respectively.
Percentage of HCV Virologic Failure Participants That Developed SOF- or LDV-Associated Resistance Mutations
Percentage of participants who developed SOF- or LDV-associated resistance mutation found within HCV Virologic Failure participants. HCV virologic failure was defined as HCV RNA undetectable at end-of-treatment but HCV RNA quantifiable during follow-up with subsequent confirmation as quantifiable.
Time frame: At time of HCV virologic failure; any time from start of study treatment to 24 weeks after end of study treatment. Duration of study treatment for Cohort 1 and 2 were 12 and 8 weeks, respectively.
Count and Percentage of Participants With an Adverse Event by Type.
The adverse events considered were Grade 2 or higher adverse events (primary diagnosis, primary sign and symptom, or a primary lab), SAE according to ICH criteria, or treatment-limiting adverse events. Participants may experience more than one type of adverse event.
Time frame: Any time from start of treatment to 28 days after date of last dose of study treatment. The duration of study treatment for Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 were 12 and 8 weeks, respectively.
Count of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/mL
Because all except one participant had HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL, participants were categorized according to whether or not their HIV-1 RNA was \<5 copies/mL at each follow-up evaluation.
Time frame: 4 and 12 weeks after start of study treatment for Cohort 1. 4 and 8 weeks after start of study treatment for the 8-week regimen used in Cohort 2)
Change in CD4+ Cell Count
The change in CD4+ cell count from baseline to 12 weeks after the end of study treatment.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks after end of study treatment. Duration of study treatment for Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 were 12 and 8 weeks, respectively.
Self-reported Adherence to SOF
Count and percentage of participants who reported having taken all doses of SOF. This outcome measure was evaluated in Cohort 1 only.
Time frame: 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after starting study treatment.
Adherence as Measured by SOF Pill Count
The count and percentage of participants who had a pill count consistent with 100% of SOF doses taken. This outcome measure was evaluated in Cohort 1 only.
Time frame: 12 weeks after starting study treatment.
Self-reported Adherence to RBV
Count and percentage of participants who reported having taken all doses of RBV. This outcome measure was evaluated in Cohort 1 only.
Time frame: 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after starting study treatment.
Adherence as Measured by RBV Pill Count
The count and percentage of participants who had a pill count consistent with 100% of RBV doses taken. This outcome measure was evaluated in Cohort 1 only.
Time frame: 12 weeks after starting study treatment.
Self-reported Adherence to LDV/SOF
Count and percentage of participants who reported having taken all doses of LDV/SOF. This outcome measure was evaluated in Cohort 2 only.
Time frame: 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after starting study treatment.
Adherence as Measured by LDV/SOF Pill Count
The count and percentage of participants who had a pill count consistent with 100% of LDV/SOF doses taken.. This outcome measure was evaluated in Cohort 2 only.
Time frame: 8 weeks after starting study treatment.
Ribavirin Concentration in Plasma
Ribavirin concentration in plasma. This outcome was evaluated in Cohort 1 only.
Time frame: 4, 8, and 12 weeks after starting study treatment.
Cellular Concentration of Tenofovir Diphosphate (TFV-DP)
Cellular concentration of tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) from dried blood spot samples.
Time frame: Baseline (before HCV study treatment), EOT (end of trial dosing), 12 weeks after end of HCV study treatment. The duration of HCV study treatment for Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 were 12 and 8 weeks, respectively.
Concentration of Tenofovir Diphosphate (TFV-DP) in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs)
Concentration of tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). This outcome is measured in Cohort 1 only.
Time frame: Baseline (before SOF + RBV dosing), EOT (end of study treatment), 12 weeks after end of HCV study treatment.
Concentration of Tenofovir (TFV) in Plasma
Concentration of tenofovir (TFV) in plasma among participants who took TFV for treatment of HIV infection.
Time frame: Baseline (before HCV study treatment), EOT (end of trial dosing), 12 weeks after end of HCV study treatment. The duration of HCV study treatment for Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 were 12 and 8 weeks, respectively.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.