The purpose of TARVA is to determine whether Total Ankle Replacement (TAR) provides better clinical outcomes than ankle arthrodesis in patients aged 50-85 years with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis, and compare cost-effectiveness of the two treatments
This is a randomised, multi-centre, non-blinded, prospective, parallel-group trial of TAR versus ankle arthrodesis in patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA) aged between 50 and 85 years, comparing clinical outcomes (pain-free function, quality of life (QoL), range of motion (ROM), and rate of post-procedural complications) and cost-effectiveness. TARVA is a clinician-led, pragmatic, superiority trial designed to compare the improvement in pain-free function, as assessed by the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) walking/standing domain score from pre-op to 52 weeks post-op for each surgical treatment group. A total of 328 patients will be randomly allocated on an equal basis to one of two surgical treatments: i) Total Ankle Replacement; and ii) Ankle Arthrodesis. Randomisation will be stratified by surgeon and presence of OA in two adjacent joints as determined by a pre-operative MRI scan.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
303
The joints are resurfaced with metal implants and a mobile plastic liner is placed between them as the gliding surface.
The remaining damaged cartilage is removed from the ends of the bone and the two bones are then held together in compression using screws, or plates until they join to become one (bone fusion), so that there is no longer any movement at that joint.
Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust
Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
Brighton, United Kingdom
Self-reported pain-free function domain score
To compare the improvement in self-reported pain-free function domain score from pre-op to 52 weeks post-op for TAR versus arthrodesis, assessed by MOXFQ walking/standing domain scores.
Time frame: Pre-operation (baseline) to 52 weeks
Self-reported pain-free function domain score
To compare the improvement in self-reported pain-free function domain score from pre-op to 26 weeks post-op for TAR versus arthrodesis, assessed by MOXFQ walking/standing domain scores.
Time frame: Pre-operation (baseline) to 26 weeks
Self-reported pain and social interaction domain score
To compare the improvement in self-reported pain and social interaction domain scores from pre-op to 26 and 52 weeks post-op for TAR versus arthrodesis, assessed by MOXFQ.
Time frame: Pre-operation (baseline) to 26 and 52 weeks
Self-reported physical function
To compare the improvement in self-reported physical function from pre-op to 26 and 52 weeks post-op of TAR versus arthrodesis, assessed by the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire.
Time frame: Pre-operation (baseline) to 26 and 52 weeks
Self-reported quality of life
To compare the improvement in QoL from pre-op to 26 and 52 weeks post-op of TAR versus arthrodesis, assessed by EQ-5D.
Time frame: Pre-operation (baseline) to 26 and 52 weeks
Range of Motion
To compare the change in total ROM (plantarflexion and dorsiflexion) from pre-op to 52 weeks post-op of TAR versus arthrodesis, assessed by goniometer.
Time frame: Pre-operation (baseline) to 52 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
North Bristol NHS Trust
Bristol, United Kingdom
Cardiff and Vale Orthopaedic Centre
Cardiff, United Kingdom
Royal Derby Hospital
Derby, United Kingdom
Royal Surrey County Hospital
Guildford, United Kingdom
Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Hull, United Kingdom
Aintree University Hospital
Liverpool, United Kingdom
Freeman Hospital
Newcastle, United Kingdom
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Newcastle, United Kingdom
...and 7 more locations
Adverse events
To compare the safety of TAR versus arthrodesis in terms of complications and adverse events.
Time frame: 52 weeks
Incremental cost and cost-effectiveness
To compare the incremental cost and cost-effectiveness of TAR versus arthrodesis by recording cost of all components and procedure-related costs for each surgical treatment, and using self-reported data from the Health and Social Care Services Use questionnaire.
Time frame: 52 weeks