This phase I/Ib trial studies the side effects and best dose of azacitidine and sonidegib or decitabine and so see how well they work in treating patients with myeloid malignancies. The hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway plays an important role in cellular growth, differentiation and repair. Inappropriate activation of Hh pathway signaling and uncontrolled cellular proliferation may be associated with mutations in the Hh-ligand cell surface receptor Smo. Sonidegib binds to the Hh cell surface receptor Smo, which may result in the suppression of the Hh signaling pathway and the inhibition of cancer cells. Azacitidine and decitabine may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving azacitidine together with sonidegib or decitabine may be a safe and successful treatment for patients with myeloid malignancies.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of LDE225 (sonidegib) (days 1-28) in combination with azacitidine (overall); LDE225 (days 1-7) in combination with azacitidine (overall); and LDE225 (days 1-28) in combination with decitabine (overall). (Phase I) II. To estimate the efficacy of LDE225 (days 1-28) in combination with azacitidine in the following subgroups: untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap; relapsed/refractory AML/CMML/MDS/MPN overlap; and myelofibrosis (MF) only. (Phase Ib) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the duration of response, time to progression, overall survival, and time to AML or death (for MDS subjects) of LDE225 (days 1-28) in combination with azacitidine (overall and by cohort). (Phase I/1b) TERTIARY OBJECTIVES: I. To conduct correlative studies to measure HH pathway activation and inhibition and explore biomarkers of response. II. To evaluate quality of life (QOL) and patient-reported symptoms using the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-Core (C)30 in subjects treated with LDE225 in combination with azacitidine or decitabine. OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study of erismodegib. Patients receive azacitidine subcutaneously (SC) or intravenously (IV) on days 1-7, sonidegib orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-28 or 1-7\* or decitabine IV on days 1-5. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. \*NOTE: Sonidegib PO QD is given on days 1-7 if in combination with azacitidine or on days 1-28 is given if in combination with decitabine. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months until progressive disease and then every 6 months for 2 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
63
Given SC or IV
Given IV
Correlative studies
Ancillary studies
Given PO
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Best overall response (complete response [CR] or complete response with incomplete recovery [CRi]) in untreated AML, CMML, MDS, or MDS/MPN Overlap patients (Phase IB [Dose Expansion])
The proportion of CR/CRi responses will be estimated (by cohort) by the number of CR/CRi responses divided by the total number of evaluable patients. 95% exact binomial confidence intervals will be computed. The frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories will also be computed. Best overall response over all cycles of study treatment will also be described using frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories.
Time frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
Best overall response (CR or CRi) in myelofibrosis patients (Phase IB [Dose Expansion])
The proportion of CR/CRi responses will be estimated (by cohort) by the number of CR/CRi responses divided by the total number of evaluable patients. 95% exact binomial confidence intervals will be computed. The frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories will also be computed. Best overall response over all cycles of study treatment will also be described using frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories.
Time frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
Best overall response (CR or CRi) in relapsed/refractory AML, CMML, MDS, or MDS/MPN Overlap patients (Phase IB [Dose Expansion])
The proportion of CR/CRi responses will be estimated (by cohort) by the number of CR/CRi responses divided by the total number of evaluable patients. 95% exact binomial confidence intervals will be computed. The frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories will also be computed. Best overall response over all cycles of study treatment will also be described using frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories.
Time frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
MTD defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity in at least one-third of patients (at least 2 of a maximum of 6 new patients) (Phase I)
Graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0.
Time frame: 42 days
Duration of response
The distribution of duration of response will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time frame: Date at which the patient's earliest best objective status is first noted to be a CR/CRi response to the earliest date progression is documented, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
Incidence of adverse events graded using the NCI CTCAE version 4.0 (Phase IB [dose expansion])
The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine patterns (by cohort and overall). Additionally, the relationship of the adverse event(s) to the study treatment will be taken into consideration. The rate of grade 3 or higher non-hematologic adverse events, and the rate of grade 4 or higher adverse event (hematologic and non-hematologic) will be computed each with a 95% exact binomial confidence interval.
Time frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
Overall survival
The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time frame: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
Time to AML
The distribution of time to AML will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time frame: Time from registration to leukemic transformation due to any cause, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
Time to death
The distribution of time to death will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time frame: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
Time to progression
The distribution of time to progression will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time frame: Time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.