The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of letermovir (MK-8228) for the prevention of clinically-significant CMV infection in adult, CMV-seropositive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The hypothesis being tested was that MK-8228 is superior to placebo in the prevention of clinically-significant CMV infection through Week 24 post-transplant.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
570
Letermovir 240 mg / 480 mg tablets, or 240 mg / 480 mg intravenous solution in 250 mL to be infused over 60 minutes.
Placebo tablets, or intravenous solution in 250 mL to be infused over 60 minutes.
Percentage of Participants With Clinically-significant CMV Infection up to Week 24 Post-transplant
Clinically-significant CMV infection was defined as either one of the following: 1) onset of CMV end-organ disease, or 2) initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. The percentage of participants with clinically-significant CMV infection was assessed.
Time frame: Up to Week 24 post-transplant
Time to Onset of Clinically-significant CMV Infection (Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With a Qualifying Event at Week 24 Post-transplant)
Clinically-significant CMV infection was defined as either one of the following: 1) onset of CMV end-organ disease, or 2) initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. Time to onset of clinically-significant CMV infection was defined from the day of transplantation to the day the participant developed clinically-significant CMV infection, and was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants were censored at the last assessment for participants who discontinued or did not develop clinically-significant CMV infection.
Time frame: Up to Week 24 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With Clinically-significant CMV Infection up to Week 14 Post-transplant
Clinically-significant CMV infection was defined as either one of the following: 1) onset of CMV end-organ disease, or 2) initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. The percentage of participants with clinically-significant CMV infection was assessed.
Time frame: Up to Week 14 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With CMV End-organ Disease up to Week 24 Post-transplant
CMV end-organ disease met per-protocol diagnostic criteria for CMV-pneumonia, gastrointestinal disease, hepatitis, central nervous system disease, retinitis, nephritis, cystitis, myocarditis, pancreatitis, or other disease categories. Only Clinical Adjudication Committee-confirmed CMV end-organ disease was included in this analysis. The percentage of participants with CMV end-organ disease was assessed.
Time frame: Up to Week 24 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With CMV End-organ Disease up to Week 14 Post-transplant
CMV end-organ disease met per-protocol diagnostic criteria for CMV-pneumonia, gastrointestinal disease, hepatitis, central nervous system disease, retinitis, nephritis, cystitis, myocarditis, pancreatitis, or other disease categories. Only Clinical Adjudication Committee-confirmed CMV end-organ disease was included in this analysis. The percentage of participants with CMV end-organ disease was assessed.
Time frame: Up to Week 14 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With Pre-emptive Therapy for CMV Viremia up to Week 14 Post-transplant
Initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy was based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. The percentage of participants with initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive anti-CMV therapy was assessed.
Time frame: Up to Week 14 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With Pre-emptive Therapy for CMV Viremia up to Week 24 Post-transplant
Initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy was based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. The percentage of participants with initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive anti-CMV therapy was assessed.
Time frame: Up to Week 24 post-transplant
Time to Initiation of Pre-emptive Therapy for CMV Viremia (Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With a Qualifying Event at Week 24 Post-transplant)
The need for anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy was based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. The outcome was calculated from the day of transplantation to the start of anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy, and was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants were censored at the last assessment for participants who discontinued or did not initiate pre-emptive therapy.
Time frame: Up to Week 24 post-transplant
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.