Treatment of actinic damage has included multiple procedures but to date there is limited scientific evidence to support the preferential use of one of these therapies according to their efficacy, safety and pain tolerance by patients. This study aims to assess the efficacy of methyl aminolevulinate + daylight vs placebo + daylight to treat facial photodamage
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
60
IPS Universitaria
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Global photodamage improvement
The primary outcome is global photodamage improvement 1 month after the third daylight PDT session, according to Dover´s photodamage scale.
Time frame: 1 month after third session
Pain measurement
Pain evaluation with the visual analogue scale after 2 hours of sun exposure in each of the sessions performed (Sessions 1, 2 and 3).
Time frame: After 2 hours of sun exposure in each session
Specific Photodamage score
Specific photodamage severity score for fine lines, coarse lines, tactile roughness, mottled pigmentation, sallowness, and erythema one month after the third daylight PDT session, according to Dover´s photodamage scale.
Time frame: 1 month after the third session
Sun irradiance and illuminance quantification
Sun irradiation and illuminance quantification during exposure
Time frame: During the 2 hours of each session
Adverse events
Any adverse event
Time frame: From recruitment until 1 month after the third session
Therapy tolerance
Therapy tolerance will be recorded with a scale that includes a 4-grade severity score for oozing, erythema, oedema, desquamation, pigmentation, and vesiculation.
Time frame: 1 week after sessions 1,2 and 3
Quality of life assessment (Skindex-29 Instrument)
Quality of life assessment (Skindex-29 Instrument)
Time frame: Basal and 1 month after the third session
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.