This is a multicenter, randomized, blinded, 2-arm phase IIb trial that will compare the efficacy and safety of Lenalidomide maintenance after Bortezomib/Melphalan/Prednison (VMP) induction to VMP without maintenance (Placebo). In addition the trial will assess the treatment of Revlimid/low dose Dexamethasone (Rd) as Salvage after VMP without sufficient response (less than PR) in an observational arm. Key eligibility criteria include patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and who are 65 years of age or older or are not candidates for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Patients with poor performance status or serious coexistent medical conditions will be excluded from this study. After registration all patients receive 6 cycles VMP (modified according to Mateos et al.). Patients who receive at least a PR and completed VMP can be randomized to either Lenalidomide 10 mg/d continuously maintenance or to placebo. Randomization will be stratified according to the quality of response after VMP induction (PR vs. VGPR + stringent complete remission \[sCR\] + CR). Patients that are not able to complete VMP due to toxicity but reached at least a PR after a minimum of four cycles of therapy should immediately proceed to randomization. Blinded phase continues until progression or end of study. After unblinding, patients who received placebo should be treated with Rd. Patients that do not reach PR after induction with VMP or are progressive during treatment with VMP should not be randomized, but switched to the observation arm and treated with Rd immediately. The study treatment ends with the confirmed progression on maintenance treatment (Lenalidomide or placebo) for patients that reached PR with induction treatment, or with the confirmed progression on second-line therapy with Revlimid® and Dexamethasone for patients that did not reach PR on induction treatment. All patients will be followed up every 3 months after end of study treatment, until end of study. The study ends two years after Last Patient In (i.e. randomization for maintenance) if sufficient events for the primary endpoint were received, but not later than 8 years after trial initiation (whatever comes first).
Primary objective \- Estimate the gain in progression-free survival (PFS) by maintenance with Lenalidomide after induction with VMP in elderly patients or patients unfit for highdose chemotherapy in comparison with placebo after VMP Secondary study objectives * To compare response rates of VMP and Lenalidomide maintenance versus VMP and placebo * To compare overall survival probabilities between patients treated with Lenalidomide maintenance and patients without maintenance treatment * To compare the safety of VMP and Lenalidomide maintenance versus VMP and placebo * To compare the QoL of VMP and Lenalidomide maintenance versus VMP and placebo * To assess the safety and efficacy of Rd for poor responders on VMP
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
85
after 6 cycles VMP Patients will receive Lenalidomide given as two capsules 5 mg capsules p.o. daily until progressive disease (PD)
after 6 cycles VMP Patients will receive Placebo given as two capsules 5 mg capsules p.o. daily until progressive disease (PD)
Charité - Campus Benjamin Franklin Medizinische Klinik II
Berlin, Germany
Städtisches Klinikum Brandenburg
Brandenburg, Germany
Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH
Chemnitz, Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis Mohm / Prange-Krex
Dresden, Germany
Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis
Dresden, Germany
Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis
Güstrow, Germany
Universitätsklinkum Halle
Halle, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Abt. Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie
Jena, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Department für Innere Medizin
Leipzig, Germany
Dr. Aldaoud - Dr. Schwarzer Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
Leipzig, Germany
...and 9 more locations
Median Progression free survival
time from randomization to the first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to the end of the study (maximum of 8 years)
Time frame: maximum of 8 years
overall survival
Time frame: 5 years after randomization
sequence progression-free survival
defined as time from initial registration before start of VMP treatment to the first documentation of disease progression based on the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, or death due to any cause during the study up to the end of the PFS follow-up phase
Time frame: maximum of 8 years
efficacy parameters according to the international uniform response criteria
complete response \[CR\], stringent complete response \[sCR\], very good partial response (VGPR), partial response \[PR\], and overall response \[CR + VGPR + PR\] using IMWG criteria
Time frame: after VMP (31 weeks) and 6 months of maintenance or placebo
number and indication of adverse events
time of first study treatment until up to the end of the follow-up phase (maximum of 8 years)
Time frame: maximum of 8 years
Quality of life
initial registration up to the end of the follow-up phase (maximum of 8 years), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ (Quality of Life)-C30, QLQ-MY20 (Myeloma 20), EQ (European Questionnaire)-5D
Time frame: maximum of 8 years
Time to treatment failure
defined as a composite endpoint measuring time from randomization to discontinuation of study treatment for any reason, including disease progression, treatment toxicity, start of another anti-myeloma treatment, and death, whichever comes first
Time frame: maximum 8 years
sequence overall survival
time from registration before start of VMP treatment until death due to any cause or until censoring at the last time the patient was known to be alive
Time frame: maximum of 8 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.