This was a non-randomized, open-label, phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in Japanese moderate or more severe aplastic anemia (AA) subjects with a platelet count \<30,000/microliter who were refractory to anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-based immunosuppressive therapy (IST), who have relapsed after ATG-based IST, or who are ineligible for ATG-based IST. Eltrombopag was expected to improve trilineage blood cells and decrease transfusion frequency based on the result from the previous study in patients with severe AA. This study used the hematologic response rate, defined as the proportion of subjects showing improvement in at least one of the three blood cell lineages or a decrease in blood transfusion volume, as the primary endpoint. A total of 36 subjects were screened and 21 were enrolled in the study. Treatment with eltrombopag started at 25 milligram (mg)/day and increased by 25 mg/day every 2 weeks according to the platelet count up to 100 mg/day. Response assessment was performed at 3 months after starting the study treatment (Week 13). Subjects in whom the treatment was assessed as effective continued with the study treatment. Subjects in whom the treatment was assessed as effective (when meeting any of the response criteria) at 6 months after starting the study treatment (Week 26) might enter the extension phase and continue the treatment with eltrombopag. The primary endpoint was the hematologic response rate at Week26.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
21
White, round, film-coated tablets containing 12.5 mg of eltrombopag free acid (SB-497115-GR, eltrombopag) in each tablet
White, round, film-coated tablets containing 25 mg of eltrombopag free acid (SB-497115-GR, eltrombopag) in each tablet
Novartis Investigative Site
Aichi, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Aichi, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Hyōgo, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Ibaraki, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Ishikawa, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Miyagi, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Okayama, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, Japan
...and 2 more locations
Hematological Response at Week 26
Hematologic response rate at 6 months (at WeeK 26) after the start of study treatment was defined as the percentage of subjects who met any of the response criteria (Platelet count, Hemoglobin level, Neutrophil count). 1 ) Platelet count: an increase from baseline by 20,000/μL or more (In the absence of platelet transfusion), or no platelet transfusion requirements for 8 weeks; 2) Hemoglobin: When the baseline hemoglobin level is \<9 g/dL: Without RBC transfusion at baseline, an increase from baseline by 1.5 g/dL or more; With RBC transfusion at baseline, a decrease of at least 4 units in RBC transfusions in the post-treatment 8-week period compared to the pre-treatment 8-week period (1 unit = RBC derived from 200 mL blood); 3) Neutrophil count: an increase from baseline by 500/μL or more (in the absence of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)), or (if \< 500/μL at baseline) an increase by 100 % or more. Only descriptive analysis done.
Time frame: D183 (Week 26)
Change in Platelet Count From Baseline in the Absence of Platelet Transfusion Over Time
The changes in observed values for Platelet Count were summarized. The measurements were followed up to Week 26 and thereafter in the extension part (Up to the launch of the product after approval, which will be approximately up to two and a half years). Only descriptive analysis done.
Time frame: Up to 2.5 years
Change in Hemoglobin From Baseline in the Absence of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Over Time
The changes in observed values for Hemoglobin were summarized. The measurements were followed up to Week 26 and thereafter in the extension part (Up to the launch of the product after approval, which will be approximately up to two and a half years). Only descriptive analysis done.
Time frame: Up to 2.5 years
Change in Neutrophil Count From Baseline in the Absence of Granulocyte-colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Over Time
The changes in observed values for Neutrophil Count were summarized. The measurements were followed up to Week 26 and thereafter in the extension part (Up to the launch of the product after approval, which will be approximately up to two and a half years). Only descriptive analysis done.
Time frame: Up to 2.5 years
Hematological Response at Week 13 in Terms of the Platelet Count, Hemoglobin Level and Neutrophil Count
The frequency and percentage were calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) of responses (which meet each response criteria) of platelet count, hemoglobin and neutrophil count at Week 13.
Time frame: Week 13
Duration of Hematological Response in Participants Who Responded at the Week 13
The duration of haematological response was defined, for subjects who responded at the Week 13 visit, as the number of months from the first date of a response until the first date of a relapse or the date the subject was last assessed. Only subjects with at least 2 response assessments were included in the duration of response assessment. The measurements were followed up to Week 26 and thereafter in the extension part (Up to the launch of the product after approval, which will be approximately up to two and a half years). Only descriptive analysis done.
Time frame: Up to 2.5 years
Volume of (Platelet and RBC) Transfusion in Each Period
The amount of blood transfusion (platelets, RBC) were summarized. The measurements were followed up to Week 26 and thereafter in the extension part (Up to the launch of the product after approval, which will be approximately up to two and a half years). Only descriptive analysis done.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 92 (Week 13), Day 183 (Week 26), Extension W39 and Extension W52
Frequency of (Platelet and RBC) Transfusion in Each Period
The frequency of blood transfusion (platelets, RBC) were summarized. The measurements were followed up to Week 26 and thereafter in the extension part (Up to the launch of the product after approval, which will be approximately up to two and a half years). Only descriptive analysis done.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 92 (Week 13), Day 183 (Week 26), Extension W39 and Extension W52
Percentage of Participants With Reduced Volume of Transfusion (Platelet and RBC)
The proportion of the participants for whom the amount of blood transfusion (platelets and RBC) is decreased was measured and reported as a percentage. The measurements were followed up to Week 26 and thereafter in the extension part (Up to the launch of the product after approval, which will be approximately up to two and a half years). Only descriptive analysis done. This analysis was performed for the subjects who were baseline transfusion dependent.
Time frame: Up to 2.5 years
Percentage of Participants Who Become Transfusion (Platelet and RBC) Independent
The proportion of participants for whom blood transfusion (platelets and RBC) became unnecessary was measured and reported as a percentage. The measurements were followed up to Week 26 and thereafter in the extension part (Up to the launch of the product after approval, which will be approximately up to two and a half years). Only descriptive analysis done. This analysis was performed for the subjects who were baseline transfusion dependent.
Time frame: Up to 2.5 years
Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Eltrombopag
The frequency and percentage of subjects who experienced adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and deaths by primary system organ class (SOC) and MedDRA preferred term were summarized.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Number of Participants With Bleeding Events and Severity of Bleeding
The measurements were followed up to Week 26 and thereafter in the extension part.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Eltrombopag
At some study sites, full blood sampling for pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation of Eltrombopag was performed on Day 14 to calculate Cmax, tmax, AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-tau). PK parameters were calculated from plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Day 14 at 25 mg QD (-0.05, 0.15, 0.30, 0.45, 1.00, 1.30 and 24.00), at 50,75 and 100 mg QD (pre-dose)
Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Eltrombopag
At some study sites, full blood sampling for pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation of Eltrombopag was performed on Day 14 to calculate Cmax, tmax, AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-tau). PK parameters were calculated from plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Day 14 at 25 mg QD (-0.05, 0.15, 0.30, 0.45, 1.00, 1.30 and 24.00), at 50,75 and 100 mg QD (pre-dose)
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero (Pre-dose) to Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration Within a Subject Across All Treatments (AUC 0-t) and Over the Dosing Interval (AUC 0-tau) for Eltrombopag
At some study sites, full blood sampling for pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation of Eltrombopag was performed on Day 14 to calculate Cmax, tmax, AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-tau). PK parameters were calculated from plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Day 14 at 25 mg QD (-0.05, 0.15, 0.30, 0.45, 1.00, 1.30 and 24.00), at 50,75 and 100 mg QD (pre-dose)
Mean Change in Eltrombopag Concentration in Pharmacokinetic Serum Samples Over Time at Days 14 and 15
At every study center, blood samples was be collected on Day 15 of multiple doses of eltrombopag 25 mg to determine the plasma eltrombopag concentration prior to the next dose (trough concentration). In addition, one-point pre-dose blood sampling was performed at every study center on Day 15 of multiple doses of eltrombopag 50 mg, 75 mg and 100 mg to determine trough concentrations. PK parameters were calculated from plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Day 14 (pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 post-dose), Day 15 (pre-dose)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.