Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PT20 in Subjects With Hyperphosphataemia and Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease

Phosphate Therapeutics153 enrolled

Overview

The main purpose of this study is to see whether PT20 can help people with a high level of phosphate in their blood (called Hyperphosphatemia) that are being treated with dialysis for kidney disease.

PT20 represents a mechanism to address many of the limitations associated with current phosphate binding agents. The available clinical and non clinical evidence suggests that PT20 binds phosphate and prevents its uptake more efficiently than other phosphate binding drugs and may therefore either reduce the pill burden associated with controlling phosphate levels, or result in lower phosphate levels with the same pill burden. The this study is the first to investigate the efficacy and safety of PT20 in subjects with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

QUADRUPLE

Enrollment

153

Conditions

Hyperphosphataemia

Interventions

PT20DRUG

Modified ferric oxide adipate tablets

PlaceboDRUG

Placebo tablets matched to each PT20 dose arm

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 90 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Men or women aged 18 90 years * Subject must have a stable dialysis prescription for at least 28 days prior to start of Screening. * Subject must have the most recent serum phosphate measurement, taken during the 28 days prior to the start of Screening, of ≥ 4.0 mg/dL and ≤ 8 mg/dL. Exclusion Criteria: * Subject's most recent historical pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate value within 14 days prior to the start of Screening (Visit 1) is \< 18 mg/dL. * Subject has, in the opinion of the investigator, severe chronic lung disease and/or carbon dioxide retention.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Serum Phosphate Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)

The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in serum phosphate concentration from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29). All study specific blood samples were collected, processed and analysed using a central laboratory.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 29

Secondary Outcomes

Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)

Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in haemoglobin concentration. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for haemoglobin. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 29

Change in Serum Ferritin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)

Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in serum ferritin concentration. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment and week (Visit), as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for serum ferritin. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 29

Change in Transferrin Saturation From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)

Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in transferrin saturation. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment and week, as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for transferrin saturation. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating System (GSRS) Overall Score From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)

The GSRS assesses the impact of treatment-related GI complications. It includes 15 items divided into 5 subscales (diarrhoea, indigestion, abdominal pain, constipation, and reflux), and uses a seven-grade Likert scale to assess symptoms (1 = no discomfort at all, 7 = very severe discomfort). The total score was calculated as the average score of all 15 items. If data were missing from one or more subscales, the mean of the completed items within the subscale was to be used for the subscale score, provided that more than half of the subscale items were complete. If more than half of the items within a subscale were missing, the subscale score and overall score were also to be defined as missing. The change in overall GSRS score from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29) was summarised by treatment and a two-sample t-test was to be used to identify differences between the placebo and PT20 dose groups. The higher the score, the more severe the gastrointestinal symptoms.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 29