the gold standard for the diagnostic of acute heart failure is based on clinical, biological (BNP levels) and echocardiographic findings, but still in some cases, the diagnosis is difficult and requires further investigations. BNP dosages and echocardiography are not always available in many medical centers, especially in emergency departements, and are expensive. we investigated the use of alternative methods, such as the systolic time intervals (STI), in the diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF) in emergency departement patients consulting for dyspnea.
AHF is a common cause for dyspnea, but still hard to diagnose. in emergency departements, physicians dispose of a variety of techniques helping them to identify patients with acute onset dyspnea due to cardiac causes and allowing them to initiate the appropriate therapeutics. techniques such as the N type brain natriuretic peptid (NT BNP) dosages and echocardiography, in addition to the clinical exam, are efficient in these cases but they encounter many problems: * the BNP dosages are non-conclusive in some cases (grey zone) and must be repeated wich takes time. * echocardiography is operator - dependent technique and could be misleading in some conditions. * both BNP and echocardiography are expensive and not found in many emergency structures, especially in poor countries. all the arguments pushed us to investigate other simpler and cheaper techniques to apply in these conditions. STI is an old technique based on the recording of two parameters: electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram, and from them measuring the different systolic intervals: * pre-ejection period (PEP): defined as the interval between the beginning of the QRS wave and the first heart sound (B1). * electro-mechanic activation time (EMAT): defined as the interval between the two heart sounds B1 and B2 * the PEP / EMAT time in acute onset heart failure, the conduction times are increased, due to tissular lesions, which prolong the PEP, also the myocardial contractility is deficient and the heart puts less time to eject the blood volume which decrease the EMAT and in summary the PEP/EMAT is increased significatively. in this study protocol, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of STI compared to conventional methods in the diagnosis of acute heart failure in emergency department settings.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
530
STIs were measured using simultaneous recording of the electrocardiogram and acoustic cardiography signals using an analogic numeric system (Biopac Systems, Goleta, CA). A3-minute acoustic cardiographic tracing for all patients was obtained and stored electronically. We measured the electromechanical activation time (EMAT) which is the time between the initial deflection of the electrocardiographic Q wave and the first phonocardiographic complex corresponding to the first heart sound (S1). The left ventricle ejection time (LVET) defined as the interval between the peak components from the S1 and S2 complexes was measured on the same cardiac cycles. All studies were performed in patients in a semi-recumbent position with head at 30 degrees position. For each patient, the acoustic cardiographic parameters were calculated from a 10-second free of artifact recording of data averaging 8 to 12 beats measurements.
Nouira Semir
Monastir, Emergency Department Monastir, Tunisia 5000, Tunisia
PEP/EMAT values between the AHF and non AHF groups
compare the PEP/EMAT values between the two study groups: AHF and non-AHF. the diagnosis of AHF is made based on clinical, BNP, and echocardiographic findings.
Time frame: at admission (an average of 24 hours)
PEP values between the two study groups
compare the PEP values between the two study groups: AHF and non-AHF. the diagnosis of AHF is made based on clinical, BNP, and echocardiographic findings.
Time frame: at admission (an average of 24 hours)
compare the EMAT values between the two study groups
compare the EMAT values between the two study groups: AHF and non-AHF. the diagnosis of AHF is made based on clinical, BNP, and echocardiographic findings.
Time frame: at admission (an average of 24 hours)
compare the STI diagnostic performance against BNP
compare the diagnostic performance, based on the area under curve estimation of the ROC curve, between the STI (PEP, EMAT and PEP/EMAT) and the BNP levels
Time frame: at hospital admission (an average of 24 hours)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.