The objectives of the study are to: * Identify a dose and dosing regimen of burosumab, based on safety and pharmacodynamic (PD) effect, in pediatric XLH participants * Establish the safety profile of burosumab for the treatment of children with XLH including ectopic mineralization risk, cardiovascular effects, and immunogenicity profile * Characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK)/PD profile of the KRN23 doses tested in the monthly (Q4) and biweekly (Q2) dose regimens in pediatric XLH patients * Determine the PD effects of burosumab treatment on markers of bone health in pediatric XLH patients * Obtain a preliminary assessment of the clinical effects of burosumab on bone health and deformity, muscle strength, and motor function * Obtain a preliminary assessment of the effects of burosumab on participant-reported outcomes, including pain, disability, and quality of life in pediatric XLH patients * Evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of burosumab
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
52
solution for SC injection
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Yale University School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Indiana University Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Shriners Hospital for Children
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Bicetre Hospital
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, Netherlands
Royal Manchester Hospital
Manchester, Lancashire, United Kingdom
Birmingham Children's University
Birmingham, United Kingdom
Great Ormond Street Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Change From Baseline in RSS Total Score Over Time
The RSS system is a 10-point radiographic scoring method that was developed to assess the severity of nutritional rickets in the wrists and knees based on the degree of metaphyseal fraying, cupping, and the proportion of the growth plate affected. Scores are assigned for the unilateral wrist and knee X-rays deemed by the rater to be the more severe of the bilateral images. The maximum total score on the RSS is 10 points and the minimum score is 0, with a total possible score of 4 points for the wrists and 6 points for the knees. Higher scores indicate greater rickets severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Over Time
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in Serum 1,25(OH)2D Over Time
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in TmP/GFR Over Time
Data for urinary phosphorus and TRP were used in calculation TmP/GFR.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in RSS Knee Scores Over Time
The RSS system is a 10-point radiographic scoring method that was developed to assess the severity of nutritional rickets in the wrists and knees based on the degree of metaphyseal fraying, cupping, and the proportion of the growth plate affected. Scores are assigned for the unilateral wrist and knee X-rays deemed by the rater to be the more severe of the bilateral images. The maximum total score on the RSS is 10 points and the minimum score is 0, with a total possible score of 4 points for the wrists and 6 points for the knees. Higher scores indicate greater rickets severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in RSS Wrist Scores Over Time
The RSS system is a 10-point radiographic scoring method that was developed to assess the severity of nutritional rickets in the wrists and knees based on the degree of metaphyseal fraying, cupping, and the proportion of the growth plate affected. Scores are assigned for the unilateral wrist and knee X-rays deemed by the rater to be the more severe of the bilateral images. The maximum total score on the RSS is 10 points and the minimum score is 0, with a total possible score of 4 points for the wrists and 6 points for the knees. Higher scores indicate greater rickets severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Radiographic Global Impression of Change (RGI-C) Global Scores Over Time
Changes in the severity of rickets and bowing were assessed centrally by three independent pediatric radiologists contracted by a central imaging facility using a disease specific qualitative RGI-C scoring system. The RGI-C is a seven point ordinal scale with possible values: +3 = very much better (complete or near complete healing of rickets), +2 = much better (substantial healing of rickets), +1 = minimally better (i.e., minimal healing of rickets), 0 = unchanged, -1 = minimally worse (minimal worsening of rickets), -2 = much worse (moderate worsening of rickets), -3 = very much worse (severe worsening of rickets).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
RGI-C Knee Scores Over Time
Changes in the severity of rickets and bowing were assessed centrally by three independent pediatric radiologists contracted by a central imaging facility using a disease specific qualitative RGI-C scoring system. The RGI-C is a seven point ordinal scale with possible values: +3 = very much better (complete or near complete healing of rickets), +2 = much better (substantial healing of rickets), +1 = minimally better (i.e., minimal healing of rickets), 0 = unchanged, -1 = minimally worse (minimal worsening of rickets), -2 = much worse (moderate worsening of rickets), -3 = very much worse (severe worsening of rickets).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
RGI-C Wrist Scores Over Time
Changes in the severity of rickets and bowing were assessed centrally by three independent pediatric radiologists contracted by a central imaging facility using a disease specific qualitative RGI-C scoring system. The RGI-C is a seven point ordinal scale with possible values: +3 = very much better (complete or near complete healing of rickets), +2 = much better (substantial healing of rickets), +1 = minimally better (i.e., minimal healing of rickets), 0 = unchanged, -1 = minimally worse (minimal worsening of rickets), -2 = much worse (moderate worsening of rickets), -3 = very much worse (severe worsening of rickets).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Over Time
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in Standing Height Z Score Over Time
Standing height Z scores are measures of height adjusted for a child's age and sex. The Z score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population (from the CDC growth charts) in the same age range and with the same sex. A Z score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. Higher Z scores indicate a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in Growth (Standing Height) Over Time
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in Growth (Sitting Height) Over Time
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in Growth (Arm Length) Over Time
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in Growth (Leg Length) Over Time
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
6MWT Distance (Predicted Percent of Normal) Change From Baseline Over Time
The total distance walked (meters) in a 6-minute period was measured. The percent of predicted values were calculated using published normative data based on age, gender, and height (Geiger et al. 2007).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in POSNA-PODCI (Normative Score) Upper Extremity Scale Scores Over Time
The POSNA-PODCI yields 4 functional assessment scores: Upper Extremity Function,Transfers and Basic Mobility, Sports and Physical Function, and Comfort/Pain. In addition, a Global Function score, which is an average of the 4 functional assessments, and a Happiness score are calculated. Raw, mean, standardized, and normative scores are calculated for each scale. Normative scores are calculated so that higher scores indicate better functioning. All scores are referenced to the general, healthy population with a normative mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in POSNA-PODCI (Normative Score) Transfer and Basic Mobility Scale Scores Over Time
The POSNA-PODCI yields 4 functional assessment scores: Upper Extremity Function,Transfers and Basic Mobility, Sports and Physical Function, and Comfort/Pain. In addition, a Global Function score, which is an average of the 4 functional assessments, and a Happiness score are calculated. Raw, mean, standardized, and normative scores are calculated for each scale. Normative scores are calculated so that higher scores indicate better functioning. All scores are referenced to the general, healthy population with a normative mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in POSNA-PODCI (Normative Score) Sports/Physical Functioning Scale Scores Over Time
The POSNA-PODCI yields 4 functional assessment scores: Upper Extremity Function,Transfers and Basic Mobility, Sports and Physical Function, and Comfort/Pain. In addition, a Global Function score, which is an average of the 4 functional assessments, and a Happiness score are calculated. Raw, mean, standardized, and normative scores are calculated for each scale. Normative scores are calculated so that higher scores indicate better functioning. All scores are referenced to the general, healthy population with a normative mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in POSNA-PODCI (Normative Score) Pain/Comfort Scale Scores Over Time
The POSNA-PODCI yields 4 functional assessment scores: Upper Extremity Function,Transfers and Basic Mobility, Sports and Physical Function, and Comfort/Pain. In addition, a Global Function score, which is an average of the 4 functional assessments, and a Happiness score are calculated. Raw, mean, standardized, and normative scores are calculated for each scale. Normative scores are calculated so that higher scores indicate better functioning. All scores are referenced to the general, healthy population with a normative mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in POSNA-PODCI (Normative Score) Happiness Scale Scores Over Time
The POSNA-PODCI yields 4 functional assessment scores: Upper Extremity Function,Transfers and Basic Mobility, Sports and Physical Function, and Comfort/Pain. In addition, a Global Function score, which is an average of the 4 functional assessments, and a Happiness score are calculated. Raw, mean, standardized, and normative scores are calculated for each scale. Normative scores are calculated so that higher scores indicate better functioning. All scores are referenced to the general, healthy population with a normative mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in POSNA-PODCI (Normative Score) Global Functioning Scale Scores Over Time
The POSNA-PODCI yields 4 functional assessment scores: Upper Extremity Function,Transfers and Basic Mobility, Sports and Physical Function, and Comfort/Pain. In addition, a Global Function score, which is an average of the 4 functional assessments, and a Happiness score are calculated. Raw, mean, standardized, and normative scores are calculated for each scale. Normative scores are calculated so that higher scores indicate better functioning. All scores are referenced to the general, healthy population with a normative mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in FEP Over Time
FEP is defined as 100% × (urine phosphorus × serum creatinine)/(urine creatinine × serum phosphorus), where the 2-hour urine sample was used for urine phosphorus and urine creatinine.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in P1NP Over Time
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64
Change From Baseline in CTx Over Time
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64
Change From Baseline in ALP Over Time
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Change From Baseline in BALP Over Time
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Serum Pre-Dose Concentrations of Burosumab
Time frame: Week 40, 64, 160
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An SAE is defined as an AE or suspected adverse reaction that at any dose results in any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening AE; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions; a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Severity was graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). TEAEs are defined as AEs with onset on or after the time of initiation of study drug administration.
Time frame: Up to 216 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.