The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of KPI-121 ophthalmic suspension compared to placebo in subjects who have undergone cataract surgery. The efficacy and safety of two different concentrations and two different dosing regimens of KPI-121 are also being assessed.
This is a Phase III, multicenter, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses and two dosing regimens of KPI-121 ophthalmic suspension versus placebo in subjects who require treatment of postoperative anterior ocular inflammation. Approximately 500 subjects will be screened and up to 402 subjects with one study eye each will be randomized in this study at approximately 25 centers located in the United States. Subjects who experience postoperative inflammation on the first day following routine, uncomplicated, cataract surgery and who meet all other eligibility criteria will be randomized to one of four study groups (0.25% four times daily or 1.0% two times daily) or Placebo A four times daily or Placebo B two times daily. Drug product or placebo will be initiated on the day following surgery and instilled as one to two drops in the study eye according to the assigned dosing regimen for 14 days. This study will include up to 7 clinic visits (including the surgery day) over 18 to 33 days total study duration. Visit 1 (Screening) will occur between 14 to 1 day(s) prior to surgery, and subjects who meet preoperative screening inclusion/exclusion criteria will be entered into the study. At Visit 2 (Surgery/Day 0) subjects will undergo routine cataract surgery according to the Investigator's normal procedures. Visit 3 (Randomization/Day 1) will occur on the day following surgery. Following randomization, subjects will be instructed to return to the clinic to be evaluated at Visit 4 (Day 3 +2 day), Visit 5 (Day 8 ±1 day), and Visit 6 (Day 15 ±1 day). The last dose of study product will be administered upon completion of 14 days of evaluation. Following the End of Study Product Use Visit (Visit 6; Day 15 ±1 day), subjects will be asked to return to the clinic on Day 17-19 for Visit 7 (Follow-Up) and will be released from the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
380
KPI-121 drug product will be supplied as 0.25% as a suspension in identically packaged opaque dropper bottles. KPI-121 drug product is a sterile, aqueous, submicron suspension of loteprednol etabonate.
KPI-121 drug product will be supplied as 1.0% as a suspension in identically packaged opaque dropper bottles. KPI-121 drug product is a sterile, aqueous, submicron suspension of loteprednol etabonate.
Placebo control arms will receive the same bottles containing vehicle of KPI-121 including all components at the concentrations used in the KPI-121 drug product with the exception of the active component, loteprednol etabonate.
Sall Research Medical Center
Artesia, California, United States
Resolution of Anterior Chamber Cells
Subjects with complete resolution of anterior chamber cells (cell score = 0) without rescue medication at Day 8/Visit 5 and Day 15/Visit 6. 0= No cells seen 1. 1 to 5 cells 2. 6 to 15 cells 3. 16 to 30 cells 4. greater than 30 cells
Time frame: Visit 5 (postoperative day 8) and Visit 6 (postoperative day 15)
Resolution of Ocular Pain
Subjects with complete resolution of pain (grade = 0) without rescue medication at Day 8/Visit 5 and Day 15/Visit 6.
Time frame: Visit 5 (postoperative day 8) and Visit 6 (postoperative day 15)
Anterior Chamber Cell Grade at Visit 5.
Mean Grade of Anterior Chamber Cells (Scale 0-4) at Visit 5/Day 8. The difference in mean grade of AC cell count grade at Day 8 for KPI-121 1% dosed twice daily (BID) or 0.25% dosed four times daily (QID) compared with vehicle (either dosed BID or QID). Investigators were asked to grade AC cell based on the following scale wherein higher scores indicate a higher degree of cells present and a decrease across time indicates the condition is getting better. Anterior Chamber Cells 0 = No cells seen 1. 1 - 5 cells 2. 6 - 15 cells 3. 16 - 30 cells 4 = greater than 30 cells
Time frame: Visit 5 (postoperative day 8)
Anterior Chamber Cell Grade at Visit 6.
Mean Grade of Anterior Chamber Cells (Scale 0-4) at Visit 6/Day 15. The difference in mean grade of AC cell count grade at Day 15 for KPI-121 1% dosed twice daily (BID) or 0.25% dosed four times daily (QID) compared with vehicle (either dosed BID or QID). Investigators were asked to grade AC cell based on the following scale wherein higher scores indicate a higher degree of cells present and a decrease across time indicates the condition is getting better. Anterior Chamber Cells 0 = No cells seen 1. 1 - 5 cells 2. 6 - 15 cells 3. 16 - 30 cells 4 = greater than 30 cells
Time frame: Visit 6 (postoperative day 15)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Placebo control arms will receive the same bottles containing vehicle of KPI-121 including all components at the concentrations used in the KPI-121 drug product with the exception of the active component, loteprednol etabonate.
North Valley Eye Medical Group
Mission Hills, California, United States
Martel Eye Medical Group
Rancho Cordova, California, United States
Wolstan & Goldberg Eye Associates
Torrance, California, United States
Clayton Eye Center
Morrow, Georgia, United States
Price Vision Group
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
John-Kenyon American Eye Institute
New Albany, Indiana, United States
Taustine Eye Center
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Tauber Eye Center
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Tekwani Vision Center
St Louis, Missouri, United States
...and 13 more locations
Ocular Pain Grades at Day 8.
Mean Grade of Ocular Pain (Scale 0-5) at Visit 5/Day 8. The difference in mean grade of ocular pain grade at Day 8 for KPI-121 1% dosed twice daily (BID) or 0.25% dosed four times daily (QID) compared with vehicle (either dosed BID or QID). Subjects were given the Subject-Rated Ocular Pain Assessment to subjectively rate their pain. Higher scores were worse outcomes. The following scoring scale was used for ocular pain: 0 = None 1. Minimal 2. Mild 3. Moderate 4. Moderately Severe 5. Severe
Time frame: Visit 5 (postoperative day 8)
Ocular Pain Grades at Day 15.
Mean Grade of Ocular Pain (Scale 0-5) at Visit 6/Day 15. The difference in mean grade of ocular pain grade at Day 15 for KPI-121 1% dosed twice daily (BID) or 0.25% dosed four times daily (QID) compared with vehicle (either dosed BID or QID). Subjects were given the Subject-Rated Ocular Pain Assessment to subjectively rate their pain. Higher scores were worse outcomes. The following scoring scale was used for ocular pain: 0 = None 1. Minimal 2. Mild 3. Moderate 4. Moderately Severe 5. Severe
Time frame: Visit 6 (postoperative day 15)