The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the performance and safety of the HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist System (HM3 LVAS) To support obtaining CE Mark for the HM3 LVAS in Europe, a multi-center clinical study will be conducted in multiple countries. The clinical study will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, ICH/GCP and EN ISO 14155:2011 Requirements for Clinical Investigations and in accordance with country-specific requirements, under one clinical study protocol. This study will evaluate the performance of the HM3 LVAS, side effects and undesirable conditions within acceptable risks and weigh them against the intended performance of HM3 LVAS in accordance with Essential Requirements 2, 5 and 16 of the Active Implantable Medical Device Directive 90/385/EEC (AIMDD).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
Implantation of left ventricular assist device for hemodynamic support
The Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
AKH Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, Austria
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM)
Prague, Czechia
Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW Thorax- und Kardiovaskularchirurgie Clinic
Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Universitats-Herzzentrum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, Germany
Herzentrum Leipzig GmbH
Leipzig, Germany
National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery
Astana, Kazakhstan
Survival
Comparison of survival at 6 months of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) support to a performance goal established using matched HeartMate II INTERMACS data
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status developed by the EuroQol Group. Patients describe their perceived health status using an analog scale with 0 as the worst health the patient can imagine and 100 as the best health (Visual Analog Score). The patients' scores at one, three and six months were compared to their baseline scores and the resulting positive scores indicated improved quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6
Functional Status - Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
The Six Minute Walk Test(6MWT)measures the distance that a patient can walk in a period of 6 minutes. The distance walked is measured in meters. This test measures the patients' functional status. The more meters a patient can walk over baseline indicates improvement in functional status.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6
Functional Status - New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
NYHA classification relates symptoms to every day activities and patients quality of life. Class 1 = no limitations on physical activity Class 2 - slight limitation of physical activity Class 3 - marked limitation of physical activity Class 4 = unable to carry out any physical activity without discomfort
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6
All Adverse Events
Frequency of pre-defined anticipated adverse events
Time frame: As they occurred, Baseline through 180 Days
Device Malfunctions
Frequency and incidence of device malfunction
Time frame: As they occurred, Baseline through 180 Days; Subjects that remain ongoing after 6 months will continue to be followed to 24 months post-implant or outcome
Reoperations
Frequency of reoperations
Time frame: As they occurred, Baseline through 180 Days
Rehospitalizations
Frequency and incidence of rehospitalizations
Time frame: As they occurred, Baseline through 180 Days
Stroke Free Survival
Percentage of participants free of debilitating stroke (Modified Rankin Score \> 3)
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.